|
[Sponsors] |
How to define the turbulent k near the wall ? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 30, 2013, 02:27 |
How to define the turbulent k near the wall ?
|
#1 |
New Member
hp
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14 |
hello everyone,
I wish to define the solution of the turbulent kinematic energy solution near the wall, in Fluent. My case is standard k-e with standard wall function. From the ansys help we can see that the k-equation is solved in the whole domain including near the wall, while the epsilon adjacent to the wall is calculated from the near-wall equ with is derived from the local equilibrium hypothesis. After the solution I found that the production of k (Gk) is zero everywhere on the wall, which is very different from the Gk equ based on the local equilibrium hypothesis. I wish to give a definition of the k in order to force the local equilibrium near the wall. Could anybody give some advice how i can do this? Many thanks!! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent cyclic pipe flow, wall functions and y+ | clyde | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | March 17, 2014 06:08 |
what is the 'Wall Turbulent Prandtl Number'? | begginer | FLUENT | 2 | October 1, 2013 22:42 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 03:32 |
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent | romekr | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 26, 2011 12:11 |
Define wall using UDF | Abhijit | FLUENT | 3 | October 26, 2007 10:16 |