# particle time step size, number of time steps in DPMPM

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 22, 2014, 08:21 #21 New Member   Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11 Rep Power: 4 Hi Amir sir In my heat sink cooling problem actually I want relative humidity of 15% at the exit of the sink but I am getting it 7.42% , I tried with different combinitions of particle time step size and number of time steps. In this particular process I have given mass flow rate of 4.22e-7 and stop time of injection as 100s for every combinition, But still my rate of evaporation and hence RH is not increasing. (In my problem the relative reynolds number is 0, air velocity is 1 m/s). Can you suggest me a way to resolve the problem? Regards Ruturaj

 July 3, 2014, 13:34 #22 New Member   Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 11 Rep Power: 4 Hi amir sir Actually I am able to validate results of one of paper by using DPM in FLUENT. I drawn geometry with symmetry boundary condition, but I was giving total mass flow rate through duct. But that mass flow rate must be half. So with excess mass my sink was getting overcooled. Because of your previous quick replies, I was able to understand various terms in fluent physically. Thanks a lot.

 July 29, 2016, 13:03 Particle status for DPM iteration #23 New Member   Sagar Join Date: Apr 2016 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 2 Hello I have read the Fluent User guide and also have read the posts regarding this but I am not able to comprehend the unsteady particle tracking of Fluent. I am running unsteady simulations for continuous phase and also want to have unsteady particle tracking. In the particle treatment I choose unsteady and I also choose to inject particles with fluid flow time step. Till here its good but now it starts to get messy. Firstly, if I want to inject particles at fluid flow time step why does it still asks about particle time step size and what is this parameter exactly? Secondly, the time step size of my continuous phase is 1e-5 and I keep my particle time step size as 0.0001. When I run the simulation, Fluent recognizes the number of parcels but the status for the parcels it prints on the console is wierd. Updating solution at time level N... done. Injecting 31360 particle parcels with mass 5.375e-09 at t = 0 DPM Iteration .... number tracked = 31360, escaped = 0, aborted = 0, trapped = 0, evaporated = 0, incomplete = 0, incomplete_parallel = 0 My question why the status of the particle is zero? When I try to reduce the time step size of the continuous phase to 1e-4, the same 31360 particle parcels are tracked and gives proper status (in my case they are droplets and should evaporate). The mass flow rate of the DPM phase is 0.5375 g/s and I inject 31360 particle parcels from injection file.

November 2, 2016, 03:12
#24
Senior Member

Shamoon Jamshed
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 9
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Amir No! The DPM equations are solved in unsteady fashion, but they can be considered in steady or unsteady flow fields. These two are different. Nope. In each numerical analysis, you should assure the iterations are quite enough and increasing them any further wouldn't change the results. I don't see any proportion .... You can take a look at any text book in this field; aerosols. For instance, this one: "Aerosol Technology, William C. Hinds" Bests,

Dear Amir,

I want to inject a fluid in my flow inside a nozzle that has gas in it, I used plain atomizer model. I am not sure about the diameter. What diameter should I choose?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36 zhajingjing OpenFOAM 0 April 28, 2010 04:35 andre OpenFOAM 5 June 23, 2008 10:37 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58 Sanjay Padhiar Main CFD Forum 1 March 31, 1999 12:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:30.