 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
November 7, 2012, 14:01
|
Multiple Rotating Reference Frame useful?
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 15  |
Hi,
I would like to submit a question to the Fluent users about the Multiple Rotating Reference Frame (MRF). After reading carefully the Fluent User’s Guide, I still have this question. For a steady-state analysis, what is the difference between the MRF approach and simply setting wall velocities (moving wall) without any rotating reference frame? Does MRF only help for convergence in that case? Finally, with the MRF approach, should the boundaries of the rotating reference frame be placed far enough from the rotating elements? Thank you for your help. Jérémie |
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| rotating reference frame |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Second Derivative Zero - Boundary Condition | fu-ki-pa | OpenFOAM | 11 | March 27, 2021 04:28 |
| OpenFOAM 1.6-ext git installation on Ubuntu 11.10 x64 | Attesz | OpenFOAM Installation | 45 | January 13, 2012 12:38 |
| Error with Wmake | skabilan | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | July 28, 2009 00:35 |
| OpenFOAM on MinGW crosscompiler hosted on Linux | allenzhao | OpenFOAM Installation | 127 | January 30, 2009 19:08 |
| G95 + CGNS | Bruno | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 30, 2007 00:34 |
Threaded Mode
