|
[Sponsors] |
March 25, 2013, 04:39 |
Coupled solver, computational cost
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Francisco
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Spain
Posts: 273
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi everybody guys,
I'm solving a wind turbine starting with the steady laminar case and using a pressure-based coupled algorithm. I have a few questions about the setup. I've looked at the theory guide but I don't know how the Courant number (the solver one, no the regular one) affects convergence. The only thing theory guide says is 1/CFL=(1-alpha)/alpha. I increased CFL from default 200 to 200000 but then I reduced it to 200 as it seemed to increase computational cost. Residuals went up so I had to reduce uder-relaxation factor (URF) to half of its value for momentum and pressure (0.75 to 0.375 each). Now that residuals are starting to go down I would like to increase computational speed as it is way too slow. I know increasing URF will improve that, but what about CFL? For a 1.7 Gb mesh, 8 cores parallel, 12 Gb RAM it's taking 45 min for each step. Also, I will have to do a transient laminar case and steady/transient k-omega SST, which solver setup should I use? SIMPLEC? PISO? Thanks in advance! |
|
Tags |
cfl, coupled, courant, under-relaxation factor |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some confusion about coupled solver for incompressible flow | bearcat | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 14, 2010 20:40 |
coupled solver (again) | lucioantonio | FLUENT | 0 | April 8, 2009 16:15 |
Coupled solver energy equation problem | lucioantonio | FLUENT | 0 | April 3, 2009 10:21 |
coupled solver wont work in star ccm+ | richie | Siemens | 5 | November 4, 2008 04:51 |
Re: Coupled solver + RNG K-e Model | JN | FLUENT | 1 | April 22, 2001 16:34 |