|
[Sponsors] |
Transient-FSI, Density-based, compressible -very wierd behaviour, help |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 19, 2013, 04:02 |
Transient-FSI, Density-based, compressible -very wierd behaviour, help
|
#1 |
New Member
Marcin K
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
I'm having lots of difficulties with setting up a FSI case with system coupling and the density-based solver. Using the pressure based solver I get converged solutions quite fast, but my intent is to simulate pressure shock waves hitting and propagating from a structure. The fluid is hydraulic oil, and it is modeled as compressible using a bulk modulus compressibility and speed of sound UDF. I'm also using a velocity type inlet governed by an UDF. When I solve the case with the pressure based solver, i get converged solutions, and my structure indeed responds to the fluid in a expected manner, but I'm not getting the desired pressure-wave effects. When I run the case with the density-based solver (be it implicit or explicit formulation), I do get the propagation of the pressure waves, but the data transfer seems to be broken somehow. My structure deformation is almost nonexistant (even thou the pressure difference is very similar to the PB solver), and what is even more shocking to me...it deforms in the opposing direction as it should...what the? Above all that, when I tried to use the explicit DB solver with explicit time formulation, I received a warning that I can't use global time steping for incompressible flow, but my flow IS compressible...I've read through all of the documentation twice regarding System coupling, the solvers etc...and I just can't find any reason what this is happening. tl;dr: 1. Why is the system coupling data transfers not functioning properly with the density based solver? I've tried changing the participants order, but to no effect. 2. How can one overcome the "You can't use global time stepping for incompressible flow" error, why does it even show up?. My flow, as stated before, is compressible. 3. If you'd have any experience in simulating pressure waves, could you lend me some tips? Am I on the right track? Am I missing something obvious? Please help... |
|
June 4, 2013, 11:59 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 531
Rep Power: 21 |
I can answer Q1. The force sign passed from Fluent to System Coupling is incorrectly reversed with the density based solver. To correct this, turn on beta features in Workbench then in System Coupling add the Expert Parameter DataTransfer_ScaleFactor_Force with a value of -1.
|
|
June 13, 2013, 14:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Marcin K
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
thank you so much for your help, though it seem so awkward for such an obvious bug to pass through software testing
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure based and Density based Solver | Xobile | Main CFD Forum | 39 | August 19, 2020 06:04 |
Regarding Density based solver | Eswar | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 6, 2007 11:00 |
Density based compressible flow solution | Ahmet | Main CFD Forum | 11 | May 22, 2007 03:48 |
pressure and density based solvers | sun | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 8, 2004 06:20 |
Density based codes? | H.S.Muralidhara | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 28, 1999 06:29 |