CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

how to solve AMG Divergence in fluent?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 27, 2014, 03:42
Default how to solve AMG Divergence in fluent?
  #1
New Member
 
Non-US or Canada
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
javad2140 is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
I am working on a flame affected by external magnetic field using MHD module with fluent 14.5 .As the physical domain is attached to the email, the magnetic field is applied to the pressure inlet boundary. My settings are:

Model settings: 2D, k-w SST ,Non-premixed combustion (with 8 species), Magnetic Induction model with under relaxation of 0.6
Boundary conditions: axis,velocity inlet (for fuel), magnetic field applied in x-direction for pressure inlet boundary
Solver: Pressure Coupled

But I got the following error:
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure coupled -> Decreasing coarsening group size!
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure coupled -> Increasing relaxation sweeps!
# Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure coupled -> Changing to W-cycle!

After the detected error, I used Pseudo Trandient method, but nothing was changed (this method change the cycle type of all the equations to F-Cycle).
I decreased “coarsen by” and increased the pre-sweep for scalar and coupled parameters in advanced solution controls, but the error persist. I also reduced the URF of the pressure,energy,density, fmean, and B_y to 0.1 step by step and I couldn’t fix the problem.
When I used BCGSTAB stabilization method for flow I encountered AMG Divergence for k Equation. As I changed the Stabilization method for k, AMG divergence detected in the next equation. Finally I changed all of the equation to BCGSTAB stabilization method, But immediately all the residual changed to 1.#QNBe+00 and the solution is converged!
I should mention that the combustion with MHD equation was solved without Lorenz Force and Joule Heating, but as I turned on Lorenz force the solution process stopped working (with b_0 Scale factor of 0.1).
When I applied magnetic field for cold flow (combustion model is off), the problem converged without any error. And when I turned off magnetic problem the combustion is converged. In other word, But I cannot combine both of them.

Thank you in advance for your help.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp MHD2.bmp (91.8 KB, 34 views)
javad2140 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? Shogan FLUENT 1 May 28, 2014 15:03
Divergence detected in AMG solver: k, epsilon, pressure coupled Tanjina FLUENT 5 January 13, 2014 10:46
Problem in using parallel process in fluent 14 Tleja FLUENT 3 September 13, 2013 10:54
Problems modeling vertical axid water turbine- divergence in AMG solvers gambiss FLUENT 1 March 13, 2011 13:05
How to solve another continuum and momentum eqn? west_wing FLUENT 0 August 25, 2003 10:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.