CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Spalart-Allmaras and transition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 30, 2001, 11:08
Default Spalart-Allmaras and transition
Martin Franke
Posts: n/a

I am trying to compute a transonic airfoil testcase (RAE 2822 Case 9) with Spalart-Allmaras and transition set at 3% chord (by defining a laminar zone) and get an error message of the type

Error: > (greater-than): invalid argument [2]: wrong type [not a number]

Error Object: nan

immediately, no matter whether what options I use. On the other hand, computations with k-e work perfectly fine and yield good results. As far as I understand the manual, laminar zones are handled similarly for the eddy-viscosity models implemented.

I use version 5.5 on SuSE Linux 6.4 (Kernel 2.2.14-SMP). I applied the conditions and options according to the validation case that comes with the release; however, I tried both explicit and implicit solvers, but to no avail. The grid employed has about 20000 points and a low-Re wall resolution (Y+ approx. 1).

According to my expericence with other solvers, this case is not very critical, so that I am somewhat running out of ideas.

Any help is appreciated, thank you very much,

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 5, 2001, 20:19
Default Re: Spalart-Allmaras and transition
Posts: n/a
The k-e model does not model transition very well and o must have a transition set by setting a laminar zone.

the spalart-allmaras model on the other hand models transition well, and so often does not need a transion point specified.

i'm not sure if the Spalart-Allmaras model works with a forced transition within Fluent, and I can tell you that better results will be obtained with the spalart-allmaras model without forced transition than the k-e model with forced transition.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2001, 06:51
Default Re: Spalart-Allmaras and transition
Posts: n/a
What do you mean by forced transition ?
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 9, 2001, 09:03
Default Re: Spalart-Allmaras and transition
manaf hasan
Posts: n/a
Why K-e model dose not work well with transition it should work well even with laminar how about a case where you have turbulant in the inlet and then the flow slow dowan to transtion or even laminar. i benchmarked a flow in a pipe where the flow was in transition region there is only a problem how to defined your inlet intesity and hydrolic diameter if it is an internal flow and you must set up your mesh in a way that you can use two layer zonal model in the near wall treatment.

good luck
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fv3 term in Spalart Allmaras model bfa OpenFOAM Programming & Development 1 July 16, 2013 13:02
e-N method transition prediction morteza08 Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2010 04:12
spalart allmaras-turbulence model Usman FLUENT 1 February 24, 2009 17:50

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:14.