CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Absorption coefficient > 1 ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 26, 2001, 05:22
Default Absorption coefficient > 1 ?
  #1
Jamiro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi CFD friends!

I encoutered a kind of weird result in my pdf-combustion simulations (10 atm). Using the Discrete Ordinates Radiation Model with the WSGGM option, I got values of absorption coefficient up to 1.9! That seems to me apparently wrong, reminding the basic radiation law that the sum of absorption, transmission and reflection coefficients must be = 1. I point out that it's not a matter of grid dependency because it has been properly refined and values over 1 are spread all over the domain (and not within a confined region).

Anyone could give me an explanation: could these values make sense physically or are they definetely and anyway wrong? Are they somehow consistant with Fluent definition of absorption coefficient, which is dimensionally 1/m(lenght), whereas it should be adimensional?

Thanking you in advance.

Jamiro.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2001, 03:50
Default Re: Absorption coefficient > 1 ?
  #2
Frederic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I also have absorption coefficient>1 but i think that it is not wrong. The absorption coefficient is defined as 1/m so it is local definition. That means you have to integrate this parameter along a line. Of course, if the result of the integral is >1 then Fluent is physically wrong.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2001, 04:35
Default Re: Absorption coefficient > 1 ?
  #3
Jamiro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Frederic,

thanks for your answer. But what do you mean for 'lines'? (Actually, using 'D.O.' model I can't integrate on 'rays': do you mean the characteristic cell size or the mean beam length, according to settings?)

Thanks again.

Jamiro
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2001, 10:55
Default Re: Absorption coefficient > 1 ?
  #4
Volker Pawlik
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You are mixing up the absorption coeff. with the absorptivity. It applies: Absorptivity = emissivity (at the same wavelength); emissivity + transmisivity + reflectivity = 1, which means that for a black radiator with emissivity =1 there is no transmission or reflection.

The absorption coeff. gives the reduction of radiation passing through a medium (e.g. flue gas or even a solid like steel).
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't set absorption coefficient for inert particle lauripar FLUENT 1 May 9, 2012 15:09
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method Suzzn CFX 18 October 2, 2009 04:18
Automotive test case vinz OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 98 October 27, 2008 09:43
Absorption Coefficient Mark FLUENT 2 March 31, 2004 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47.