|
[Sponsors] |
May 26, 2001, 05:22 |
Absorption coefficient > 1 ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CFD friends!
I encoutered a kind of weird result in my pdf-combustion simulations (10 atm). Using the Discrete Ordinates Radiation Model with the WSGGM option, I got values of absorption coefficient up to 1.9! That seems to me apparently wrong, reminding the basic radiation law that the sum of absorption, transmission and reflection coefficients must be = 1. I point out that it's not a matter of grid dependency because it has been properly refined and values over 1 are spread all over the domain (and not within a confined region). Anyone could give me an explanation: could these values make sense physically or are they definetely and anyway wrong? Are they somehow consistant with Fluent definition of absorption coefficient, which is dimensionally 1/m(lenght), whereas it should be adimensional? Thanking you in advance. Jamiro. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simulation of a single bubble with a VOF-method | Suzzn | CFX | 21 | January 29, 2018 00:58 |
Can't set absorption coefficient for inert particle | lauripar | FLUENT | 1 | May 9, 2012 15:09 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 08:56 |
Automotive test case | vinz | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 98 | October 27, 2008 08:43 |
Absorption Coefficient | Mark | FLUENT | 2 | March 31, 2004 12:55 |