CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

dual or single

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 10, 2001, 09:32
Default dual or single
  #1
reza
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dear friends please let me have your comments for a cfd workstation to run fluent it is better to use dual processor mother board with pentum iii processor? thanks reza
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2001, 09:44
Default Re: dual or single
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You'd be better of buying a P4. A 1.8GHz P4 will run Fluent twice as fast as a 1GHz PIII - see the benchmarks I posted here some weeks ago.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2001, 12:24
Default Re: dual or single
  #3
Scott Whitney
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Or if you want, a dual P4 Xeon can run almost double the speed of the single P4. The key is the size of your problem. When using more that one processor, there are two steps: 1) Iterating the governing equations for each cell assigned to each processor, and 2) Sending this information between processors. If your model is a simple calculation with few cells you will spend less time of your time on step #1. Thus as the models get smaller, step #2 begins to dominate, and you get little benefit from using two processors. However if you work with large complicated models, step #1 dominates. In this extreme you can roughly double the speed of the calculation (and in some cases more than double since the operating system takes up your computer resources on only one processor).

I've got a dual 1.7 GHz Xeon and find I need to have about 2 million unknowns (7 governing equations x 300,000 cells) to approach doubling the speed of one processor - a typical medium class problem. I've also got a dual 450 MHz machine; with this I need 500,000 unknowns to approach doubling the speed of one processor. Interpolating between these results, if you buy a dual 1 GHz P3, you really need a problem with 1 million unknowns to get lots of benefit from the second processor.

Note: there is one Fluent model that people around here claim fails on more than one processor. Do a search here to make sure that isn't the model you will need.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2001, 03:58
Default Re: dual or single
  #4
Jayan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Power is important, but you must mremember that memory is the most important in Fluent, if you uses Dual P4 but your memory capacity is not enough, may be you can not running the fluent in much node. and remember chipset intel 815 have max. memory 512 MB and chipset P4 capacity of memory up to 2 GB. I think Dual P4 with 2 GB memoty is much better for your system.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2001, 07:38
Default Re: dual or single
  #5
reza
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dear friends i have a limited bugjet and i can't help the cost of a dual piv system with 2gb of ram.

on the other hand i was thinking that in my case i can have a dual piii and i dont know that what would be the choice, i mean what mother board with say 1000 mhz piii can work best.

is that configuration bears the limit 1mb or ram.

please let me know the choices, brands, limits, or links.

i appreciate your comments and look for your answers.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual cpu workstation VS 2 node cluster single cpu workstation Verdi Hardware 18 September 2, 2013 03:09
Dual Nodes is Slower Than Single Node (Reposting) Mrxlazuardin Hardware 1 May 26, 2010 10:25
Dual Nodes is Slower Than Single Node Mrxlazuardin FLUENT 0 May 21, 2010 01:48
Dual Xeon PIV 3.8Ghz vs 2x Dual Core E5130 2.0 GHz Michiel Hardware 4 July 31, 2009 06:06
Single vs Dual Processors Sam Z CFX 4 October 22, 2002 17:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:58.