CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

size of element

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 22, 2002, 00:00
Default size of element
  #1
solomon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What could be the size of the smallest possible, practicaly feasible size of single element in CFD grid for two dimensional problem.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 22, 2002, 13:24
Default Re: size of element
  #2
Alammar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Don't forget "continuum".
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2002, 01:38
Default Re: size of element
  #3
solomon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Alamar:

I do not understand when you say do not forget continuum. I wanted what the size of the fine grid element one can practicaly generate in any unit. Certainly one can not make it smaller than some value. There must be a limit.

For instance suppose one generate a rectangular mesh. Then my question is how much smaller in practical terms is the size of the single rectangle. It could be in pixeles, centimeter or any appropriate unit.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2002, 05:23
Default Re: size of element
  #4
Alammar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Given the limited resource than one has, the best grid size would be that which is enough to attain grid independance. However, when you speak of the smallest possible, one need to remember that the governing equations are applied at each cell. This cell, then, can not be smaller than allowed by the continuum hypothesis.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 23, 2002, 11:25
Default Re: size of element
  #5
Alammar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I must try and challenge myself on my previous statments. An engineer first wears his/her "engineering hat" and then correctly argues that the contnuum hypothesis is satisfied by the scale he/she is working on. The engineer then happily applies the boundary conditions to his governing equations. Now, the engineer reaches out for his back pack and grabs on his/her "mathematician hat" and forgets his/her engineering background. He/she then applies finite difference, proving with Taylor Series that the smaller the grid size, the closer the solution would be to the exact. No limits. No continuum. I may be able to say that finite volume can be a bit confusing if one is not careful! Thanks Solomom for your question! I hope I'm right this time!
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
critical error during installation of openfoam Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 14:43
Phase locked average in run time panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 15:37
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52.