CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

time step size

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 1, 2003, 18:29
Default time step size
  #1
Anna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi guys, who can tell me why time-step-size setting changes the mass-flowrate result so much? I am doing a 2D two-phase(oil-gas) UNSTEADY flow model simulation which employed VOF. Because the final flow rate cann't match the experiment data very well, I set different conditions and whatever to try to solve out. Usually I set time-step-size as 1, when I set 0.5, the mass flow rate at outlet doubled, moreover when I set o.1, the result is double of the 0.5 one. I guarantee other settings are absoutly the same.My model's mass flow rate is 1e-6~2e-6kg/s usually, quite slow. It shouldn't happen from the tutorial statement. I am so appreciated for any answer.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2003, 08:18
Default Re: time step size
  #2
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A time step of 1 sec seems too high to obtain accurate results. Try reducing it to 0.001 or so, and activate the adaptive time stepping available in FLUENT.

Hi

ap
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2003, 21:26
Default Re: time step size
  #3
Anna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you ap. But what is the rule for seting the time step size? I have 9 models, 9 level temperatures and 3 kinds of oil to simulate. It seems I can't crack within one month.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2003, 10:02
Default Re: time step size
  #4
ap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is no exact rule to determine the time step size. It depends on the quality of your spatial discretization and on your system behaviour and properties.

For example, if your flow oscillates with a period T, if you want to capture the oscillation, you need a time step smaller than T.

If you use the coupled solver, you can choose between the implicit and explicit time stepping, while if you use the segregated solver, you have to use the implicit time stepping.

See the manual for differences between the two schemes and for the Courant number criterion.

Implicit time stepping is usually better, because it is always stable. However stable doesn't mean accurate

So you have to choose a time step which is small enough to allow your solution to converge in a small number of iterations (usually 10-20), and to capture your system behaviour.

I suggest you to start with a small time step and to use the adaptive time stepping.

Hi

ap

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
critical error during installation of openfoam Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01
Modeling in micron scale using icoFoam m9819348 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 October 27, 2007 00:36
Transient simulation not converging skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 September 17, 2007 17:48
natural convection - time step size co2 FLUENT 7 June 3, 2004 21:56
how to increase time step size? co2 FLUENT 6 May 17, 2004 07:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:07.