Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 10, 2004, 23:23 Questions about wall function #1 sarah_ron Guest   Posts: n/a Dear all, When wall function is used in turbulence models, it is suggested y+ is about 30. This point is easy to understand. But in "10.9.1 Near-Wall Mesh Guidelines for Wall Functions", the following statement is difficult for me to understand *It is important to have at least a few cells inside the boundary layer.* The height of boundary layer is always not known beforehand for many complex turbulence flows. So I am quite confused about this. Any response is warmly welcomed. Thanks a lot! sarah

 October 11, 2004, 12:02 Re: Questions about wall function #2 Evan Rosenbaum Guest   Posts: n/a You may need to modify your mesh after performing initial runs. Assume a near-wall mesh density, and perform a solution. Check the results to see if you have >1 cell in the boundary layer. If no, modify your mesh and try again.

 October 12, 2004, 05:02 Re: Questions about wall function #3 Mark Guest   Posts: n/a Try using the "Viscous Grid Spacing Calculator" found on the the CFD Resources Online page under Online Calculators. This should give you a rough idea of the grid spacing required.

 October 12, 2004, 06:46 Re: Questions about wall function #4 Helge Guest   Posts: n/a To apply the wall function properly you have to use a mesh spacing which follows the known rules (i.e. 200 > y+ > 20). But the second criterion you mentioned has also to be fulfilled. You have to resolve the boundary layer with some nodes. 10 is a good estimate here. For many flows it is impossible to fulfill both criteria because the boundary layer is too thin. The complete boundary layer or most of it may lay within the first, wall adjacent cell assuming that this cell fulfills the y+ criterion. In such a case you should switsch to a low-Re turbulence model which does not use a wall function approach. The mesh has to be much finer. Depending on the turbulence model a y+ between 0.1 and 1 will be required.

 October 12, 2004, 15:18 Re: Questions about wall function #5 hehe666 Guest   Posts: n/a Dear, Excellent response! The quesion is "How to determine the height of boundary layer"? As we know, for lots of complex geometry turbulence flows, there are no free flow like boundary layer flow. Any response? hehe

 October 12, 2004, 15:22 Re: Questions about wall function #6 chenjiansheng Guest   Posts: n/a "The complete boundary layer or most of it may lay within the first' How could we know that? I.e. how to determine the bounday layer height even we finish the calculation and get a rough solution? thanks sheng

 October 13, 2004, 09:22 Re: Questions about wall function #7 Helge Guest   Posts: n/a A good guess would be just to look at the velocity profile near the wall. In the regions of large gradients you should have placed an appropriate number of nodes. This of course only possible after you have made a first simulation.

 October 13, 2004, 17:27 Thanks a lot #8 sarah_ron Guest   Posts: n/a Dear all, thanks a lot! I have learned a lot! regards, sarah

 October 21, 2004, 20:22 Re: Thanks a lot #9 Chetan Kadakia Guest   Posts: n/a You can also adapt the boundary, if needed. But becareful on your cell counts when doing so. For 3D cells, 1 cell can turn into 8 and 8 can turn into 64, and 64 for can turn into 512...

 October 26, 2004, 04:44 Re: Questions about wall function #10 Arash Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Sir Hi, I want select y+ for k-epselon model in cross over around cylinder, please guide me. Best Regard Arash

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post gaottino OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 7 July 19, 2010 14:11 ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 September 5, 2008 20:50 Gary Main CFD Forum 1 December 3, 2007 11:54 mefpz FLUENT 1 October 10, 2007 13:43 D.Tandra Main CFD Forum 2 March 16, 2004 05:29

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:28.