|
[Sponsors] |
January 27, 2005, 11:12 |
F_UDMI
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Friends, I am having some problems with F_UDMI - I have never seemed to have much luck with it.
I am using it in a DEFINE_UDS_FLUX(name, f, thread) subroutine. When I put in a F_UDMI(f, thread, 0) = [a value]; line I get a segmenation violation in fluent gui. I tried with a C_UDMI using the c0 to the face f and it works, but only for a fixed value, not a variable, so it isn't much good. I would prefer to use the F_UDMI macro anyway. Is there something fundamental I am missing or is F_UDMI just broken? |
|
January 27, 2005, 11:24 |
Re: F_UDMI
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you enabled the memory with the panel user-defined-memory?Luca
|
|
January 27, 2005, 11:43 |
Re: F_UDMI
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Forgot to mention that, but yes, I have done that.
|
|
|
|