|October 22, 2006, 23:59||
Different result with 1st/2nd order implicit schem
I tried to simulate vortex shedded for a cylinder. The mesh comes from fluent tutorial so there shouldn't be a problem.
The Re=185 and according to literature, vortex shedding 'll occur with cl having an amplitude of around 0.6. when i used 2nd order implicit PISO with time step=0.2, i got the correct answer. however, if 1st order implicit PISO is used, with time step=0.2, i got the vortex shedding but the cl amplitude stablises at around 0.2. with time step=0.1, amplitude is 0.4.
is it that for 1st order, the simulation must use a smaller time step to get correct ans? is there a way to estimate or is it better to use adpative time stepping?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|CFL condition for higher order schemes||Shyam||Main CFD Forum||2||February 14, 2008 15:24|
|Implicit, high-order methods for Incompressible NS||Dave Rudolf||Main CFD Forum||10||January 29, 2007 11:13|
|Euler (explicit or implicit)||anybody||Main CFD Forum||2||May 8, 2006 02:12|
|Higher order discretization on staggered grid||Chandra Shekhar||Main CFD Forum||9||January 27, 2005 17:31|
|Physical Reason for stability of Implicit Schemes?||radhakrishnan||Main CFD Forum||25||December 7, 2000 16:25|