|
[Sponsors] |
February 28, 2007, 08:24 |
compressible / incompressible?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I've written an UDF to direcly link the material density to it's temperature. It is supposed to be an laminair incompressible fluid. When I display the temperature and the densisty, to my knowledge these two should be identical. But although they look almost the same they are not a perfect match. My guess is Fluent is modeling it like a compressible fluid, hence the small densisty differences. Can you explain to me what I'm overlooking or should change in Fluent? Regards, P. |
|
February 28, 2007, 09:06 |
Re: compressible / incompressible?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi , u have seemed to use a UDF in which density is a function of a temperature , right , so u will see some difference in the two plots of temperature and density. R u lookin for natural convection case ? As far as my knowledge is concerned , u cannot comment on a flow ( u have mentioned fluid , did u meant flow ?)compressible or incompressible depending on just density variation with temperature , which i mention is a case of a pure natural convection case , where the flow is still modelled as incompressible
I think fluent is correct in its representation as far as u r lookin for convection case, let me what u think of regards pratik |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
compressible and incompressible flow | chinababu | FLUENT | 4 | November 13, 2008 05:56 |
Can a compressible solver solve incompressible ? | jinwon park | Main CFD Forum | 17 | December 13, 2007 05:00 |
Compressible -> incompressible. | Jinwon | Main CFD Forum | 6 | November 23, 2007 21:07 |
Incompressible and compressible flow. | John. | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 15, 2004 11:29 |
Compressible vs. Incompressible formulations | Fernando Velasco Hurtado | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 7, 2000 16:51 |