|
[Sponsors] |
April 26, 2007, 06:33 |
k-epsilon turbulence modelling
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Am fairly new to CFD, was wondering if anyone could clarify the differences between the standard, realisable and RNG k-epsilon models in fluent, have been able to find some info on the RNG but very little on realisable. Thanks for help |
|
April 26, 2007, 08:16 |
Re: k-epsilon turbulence modelling
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
First thing you may want to do is that you refer to fluent documentation. I have found some useful info on each turbulence model. Though such info may not be detailed, it is a starting point. In general, K-e models share a common concept and hence whatever material or text book you find on a standard k-e modeling will help. Cheers Amr |
|
May 4, 2007, 12:39 |
Re: k-epsilon turbulence modelling
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The Fluent documentation is a good start. It mentions situations where each model has its benefits.
In addition, a book on numerical solutions (with a section on CFD, of course) should provide help. Finally, many journal articles have been published discussing turbulent solution schemes and their application to a specific part, e.g. a nozzle. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 20:21 |
a book for turbulence modelling | Prapanj | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 21, 2007 05:13 |
Review paper on state of turbulence modelling | cjtune | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 25, 2004 03:41 |
Turbulence Modelling | Richard Keays | FLUENT | 2 | May 6, 2004 00:11 |
k-ep turbulence modelling | allan thomson | Main CFD Forum | 5 | February 20, 2000 20:39 |