|February 20, 2009, 05:51||
C_MU_L(c,t) not giving laminar viscosity
According to the Fluent 6.3 UDF manual, section 3.2.3 "Cell Macros", quantities are defined as:
In my case (which involves vortices shedding, computed using k-w SST), I store 10 udms which use C_MU_L(c,t) and C_MU_T(c,t) during post-processing. From the definitions above, I inferred that for all (c,t), C_MU_L(c,t) would have been equal to 1.78e-5, for air is the fluid modeled in my case. To my surprise, a small test computing C_UDMI(c,t,13)=C_MU_L(c,t) led to an inhomogeneous distribution of C_MU_L(c,t), which average value is 0.006 in one of my sampling plane, for example. The topology of the distribution of C_MU_L(c,t) is very similar to the topology of k, which is strange given that is should be constant.
This could be a minor problem in my case, as I could replace C_MU_L(c,t) by 1.78e-5 in my UDF. However, I have no way to know beforehand the value of C_MU_T(c,t), and I fear it is not giving me what I expect it to, just like C_MU_L(c,t).
If anybody knows why I am not retreiving the values I am expecting and how to get them, I would really appreciate the help.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Turbulent viscosity in Laminar Flow||Mike||Main CFD Forum||8||April 12, 2010 11:40|
|reading laminar viscosity of cells||Siddharth Khowala||FLUENT||0||June 13, 2006 09:38|
|laminar/turbulent viscosity at the wall interface||kcng||Main CFD Forum||3||March 10, 2006 06:42|
|Help please ...Laminar viscosity variation||Sheila||CD-adapco||9||October 6, 2004 15:42|
|effective? turbulent? laminar? viscosity||MIssNancy||FLUENT||3||December 3, 2002 00:53|