CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Time Step Size-Unsteady Flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 14, 2009, 09:26
Default Time Step Size-Unsteady Flow
  #1
ck3
Member
 
Khaled
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 8
ck3 is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I using unsteady flow option in fluent to solve a separated turbulent flow over a wavy wall.

The purpose of this test is to compare the predictions of FLUENT's Realizable k-e turbulence model, against the DNS results of Maaß and Schumann.
For more detail, you can consult this link:
http://cfd.me.umist.ac.uk/ercofold/d...77/test77.html
I chose the computational domain to cover only one period of the wavy channel. The length of the periodic domain is 1 m. An 64x96 quadrilateral mesh was generated and the velocity is 0,103 m/s.
I need to define the number of steps and the steps size.
Please anyone could tell me what should be the number of steps and the step size, and also the max. number of iteration. How should I calculate them?
Thank you very much.
ck3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2009, 10:05
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Turkey
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
erkan is on a distinguished road
Hi,

As a first thought, I can recommend you to make a time-step refinement study. To have time-step independent solution you can run the case for different step-sizes and the highest step size, where the change in any reference property is small enough, can be your time-step size.
erkan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2009, 14:31
Default
  #3
Member
 
Akour
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 8
ak6g08 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

If you were solving a DNS problem I suppose the way you would calculate the required time-step is by calculating the kolmogorov timescale, but since you are doing k-epsilon which is a RANS model, you arent going to resolve the kolmogorov scales, if you know (approximately) how much energy is going into the system, equate this to the turbulent dissipation (epsilon) and calculate the kolmogorov timescale (formula is on wikipedia), you should know your integral timescale (based on the largest domain or eddy size divided by some characteristic large scale velocity, use what you are using to calculate your reynolds number), your timestep should be somesort of average of the two...as a ball park figure (closer to the kolmogorov scale to be conservative). As far as how many iterations per timestep...this is hard to say, it depends on what residuals you use, something like 1e-4 for momentum and continuity should be ok...set the iterations really high for ONE timestep (set them to 500) and then look at how many timesteps it takes for the solution converges on the first timestep, will give you a good indication of how many you will need. Hope that helps

akour
ak6g08 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2009, 17:06
Default
  #4
ck3
Member
 
Khaled
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 8
ck3 is on a distinguished road
Thank you (erkan and ak6g08) for your answer.
Dear akour, Give me your e-mail to send you the artical of Maass and Schumann for more details.
ck3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] dm2747 FLUENT 0 April 17, 2009 01:29
Phase locked average in run time panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 15:37
General grid/element size and time step questions stu CFX 1 May 24, 2007 05:37
time step for inviscid supersonic wedge flow. yaseer Main CFD Forum 1 March 8, 2007 10:40
unsteady calcs in FLUENT Sanjay Padhiar Main CFD Forum 1 March 31, 1999 12:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:20.