CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

I have a problem with second order accurate solver

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 13, 2010, 17:35
Default I have a problem with second order accurate solver
  #1
New Member
 
mahmoud
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
mym1411 is on a distinguished road
Hi
I am trying to simulate a Mach 6 laminar flow around ahemispherical cylinder body. The problem is steady and I start with first-order accurate discretization. The convergence is perfect and the contours are smooth and OK as long as the solver is first-order. After some inerations, I switch to second-order ccuracy for better results. The forces remain unchanged, but the residulas jump to from 10e-5 to say 10e-1, and the contours get less smooth. Then happens even if I started with second order from the beginning. I tried Roe and AUSM schemes, but they rae the same.
Would you kindly help me with this issue?
Thanks in advance
Mahmoud
mym1411 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2010, 18:59
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
Rep Power: 10
DoHander is on a distinguished road
It is normal to have a jump in residual when you switch from first order to second order, but after a few iterations the residual should go down.

If you want to start from start with a second order solution, normally this will converge slower then your first order (especially if you have a transonic/supersonic speed) ... If after say 3-5000 iteration you see no improvements in residuals you should use a lower CFL number (if you use the density based solver) or smaller relaxation factors. If none of the above works ... change your mesh.

You could try to give more details: what kind of mesh are you using, turbulence model, y+, solver and so on ...

Do
DoHander is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2010, 04:31
Default
  #3
New Member
 
mahmoud
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
mym1411 is on a distinguished road
Hi Do
Thanks a lot for your reply.
the case is laminar, so, no y+ value. the solver is density-based, the mesh is structured with very small cell size at the walls and in the shock region (1e-4m). I start with very samll CFL value and increase it gradually. The solution converes to high residuals with second-order (from the start or fed from a first-order) The resiuals do not improve even with more iterations

What do you think?
mym1411 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem with developing new LES solver Edison_Ge OpenFOAM 2 June 18, 2009 01:26
CFX 11 x64 solver? problem Attesz CFX 6 June 7, 2009 08:37
Through-Flow solver, Leading-Trailing edge problem Menander Main CFD Forum 0 May 14, 2008 18:14
Problem going to second order andrewburns OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 February 11, 2008 18:28
Coupled solver problem! Alain FLUENT 0 February 28, 2007 07:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:33.