|
[Sponsors] |
Help: Third-order MUSCL for flame propagation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 7, 2010, 12:19 |
Help: Third-order MUSCL for flame propagation?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 17 |
I find this from FLUENT HELP:Compared to the second-order upwind scheme, the third-order MUSCL has a potential to improve spatial accuracy for all types of meshes by reducing numerical diffusion, most significantly for complex three-dimensional flows, and it is available for all transport equations.
But, The third-order MUSCL currently implemented in FLUENT does not contain any flux-limiter. As a result, it can produce undershoot and overshoot when the flow-field under consideration has discontinuities such as shock waves. So can I use MUSCL scheme for simulation of flame propagation? I am not sure that if the flame front has such kind of discontinuities. Thank you! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IS calc. with 2nd order discret. always necessary? | Azman | FLUENT | 2 | March 14, 2013 04:28 |
1st order vs 2nd order | ken | FLUENT | 8 | March 14, 2013 03:43 |
How to compute UDS fourth order gradient | Emma66 | FLUENT | 1 | April 27, 2010 05:44 |
Unstable flow simpleFoam 2nd order | Valle | OpenFOAM | 0 | August 26, 2009 08:12 |
CFL condition for higher order schemes | Shyam | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 14, 2008 14:24 |