CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

About fine meshing near small cracks

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 5, 2011, 22:36
Default About fine meshing near small cracks
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 6
aleisia is on a distinguished road
I built a model in gambit, I started with creating many volumes, and created those "doors" and "windows" and "cracks" by spliting different volumes with each other, so I have the openings left. Since the cracks are really small, I created some volumes surrounding these window and door cracks just to get a much finer grid around them, of'coz these volumes are split from each office, and I didn't set their surface BCs so as a default their surfaces will be INTERIOR, just the way I want them to be.
Then when I mesh the model, I started with each surrounding volume of the window, creating finer grid, then the volumes around the door cracks. After that, I mesh the six offices one by one, with a coarser grid. I then mesh the left whole domain with a even coarser grid. I always use tet/hybrid to mesh my model.

I can see, for example, at the interface of the surrounding volume a window, the mesh size of the surrounding volume and that of the whole domain is different, and the latter large tetrahedron doesn't seem to have a multigrid nice transition of grid size. I'm a little worried about this, is this OK? Is the way I model this model in gambit OK? I mean, do I have to set the surfaces between surrounding volumes of windows and doors with offices and whole domain as INTERFACE so that FLUENT can connect the surfaces for me and make the grid size transition smoothly? I actually tried it, but gambit said it didn't work.

What about the size difference between the surrounding volumes and say, the whole domain? can I just neglect that? Is there some other way to work this out?
aleisia is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2011, 05:43
Super Moderator
-mAx-'s Avatar
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,061
Rep Power: 31
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
pictures would help to understand.
I assume you have connectivity problem
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is free meshing or mapped meshing is best for flow problems shanu Main CFD Forum 0 February 18, 2010 12:58
is free meshing or mapped meshing is best for flow problems shanu OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 February 18, 2010 12:56
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder Nutrex Main CFD Forum 4 July 29, 2008 11:03
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing Ken Main CFD Forum 0 September 4, 2003 11:09
Is conformal meshing really an advantage? Alvin Szeto Main CFD Forum 19 June 27, 2003 07:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15.