CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

What should be the reference area for a 2d Airfoil Analysis

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By AdrienL
  • 2 Post By Far
  • 1 Post By NonStopEagle

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 30, 2011, 11:57
Post What should be the reference area for a 2d Airfoil Analysis
  #1
New Member
 
Nikhil
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
nikhiljohn is on a distinguished road
I have an airfoil (2d) of chord length 1 meter. The length of the camber line is 1.06m. The cross sectional area (2d enclosed area) is 0.17 meters. What should I give as the reference area if fluent for getting the correct cl.

Thanks everyone in advance for your help.
nikhiljohn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2011, 10:11
Default
  #2
Member
 
Adrien Lemoine
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Paris,France
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 14
AdrienL is on a distinguished road
Most of the time Airfoils use the square of the chord length as the reference area

Sincerly

Adrien
pappusam likes this.
__________________
-------------------------------------------
Plz add reputation if the answer is correct

A cœur vaillant rien d'impossible
------------------------------------------
AdrienL is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 1, 2011, 11:46
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Nikhil
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
nikhiljohn is on a distinguished road
Thanks You
nikhiljohn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2011, 00:23
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Shibin Mohamed
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 14
smab is on a distinguished road
I have my NACA 23015 airfoil(flow speed 36m/s) which has a chord length of 100mm, max thickness 15.05mm,...
after scaling the grid to metres...what should be the reference values for area, length and depth...
i am unable to obtain correct values for Cl and Cd...please help
its very urgent....
smab is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 24, 2011, 16:13
Default Refrence Area
  #5
New Member
 
Nikhil
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 14
nikhiljohn is on a distinguished road
The reference area should be your chord length (after scaling) and leave the length and the depth with the default values.
nikhiljohn is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 13, 2016, 21:30
Default
  #6
Far
Super Moderator
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,553
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Just want to add something.

Reference area is Length and depth. Since depth is taken as 1, therefore reference area for 2d airfoil is taken as c * 1 = Chord length
Dronzer and nk1802 like this.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 10, 2020, 02:19
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Pappu
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
pappusam is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrienL View Post
Most of the time Airfoils use the square of the chord length as the reference area

Sincerly

Adrien
kindly could you tell me, from where you have taken this? (i.e. ref. area = square of the chord length)
pappusam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2020, 06:29
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 6
NonStopEagle is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pappusam View Post
kindly could you tell me, from where you have taken this? (i.e. ref. area = square of the chord length)
Alright so, for an airfoil (i.e a 2-d section of a wing), the formula for cl is,
cl = lift/(0.5)*rho*(v^2)*c
where c is the chord length. Since there is no depth in a 2-d simulation, the depth value in the reference values is set to 1. reference area in fluent then has to be the length that you input (i.e. the chord length).
the reference area then becomes,
reference area = length*depth = chord*1 = chord.
So if you are running a 2d simulation of an airfoil, no matter the camber, always take the reference area as the chord.
ama294 likes this.
NonStopEagle is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 15, 2023, 01:13
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Naren
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
Narendhiran_IIT_Madras is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,
I need some clarity on the reference area calculation of 2D airfoil in fluent
For example: Chord =0.1 m, then reference area = chord * depth.
By default(2D airfoil) depth =1. i.e.1 m
so, ref area = 0.1*1=0.1 m^2, Physically it represents an airfoil with chord 0.1 m and depth(span)=1 m...

So my question is "Does the default depth value(=1) for 2D airfoil gives correct reference area?"
Narendhiran_IIT_Madras is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2023, 02:43
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
orborneee is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narendhiran_IIT_Madras View Post
Hi everyone,
I need some clarity on the reference area calculation of 2D airfoil in fluent Super Mario
For example: Chord =0.1 m, then reference area = chord * depth.
By default(2D airfoil) depth =1. i.e.1 m
so, ref area = 0.1*1=0.1 m^2, Physically it represents an airfoil with chord 0.1 m and depth(span)=1 m...

So my question is "Does the default depth value(=1) for 2D airfoil gives correct reference area?"
The exercise is really difficult, I'm still working on it step by step
orborneee is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
airfoil, reference areas, reference values


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 05:21
Reference Values- Reference Area Shivakanth FLUENT 12 June 6, 2017 00:18
Multi-element airfoil analysis CFD Rookie Main CFD Forum 12 November 17, 2016 06:07
OpenFoam-1.7.x on Suse 11.2 (64bit) does not compile val46 OpenFOAM Installation 4 August 27, 2010 03:43
Compiling new Solver with wmake lin123 OpenFOAM 3 April 13, 2010 14:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36.