CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Non-thermal equilibruim model in fluent

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By mettler

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 27, 2011, 05:55
Default Non-thermal equilibruim model in fluent
  #1
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
is it possible to use non-thermal equilibrium model in fluent for porous zone...
if yes what are the steps involved in it??
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 10:09
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
If I remember correctly, yes you can. I believe it was just a option you clicked - maybe where you activate the energy equation
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:13
Default
  #3
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
yes i have defined the porous zone with viscous and inertial resistance along with porosity bt i dnt knw whr to attach the source term for solid matrix and i defined UDS for that bt still it won't run. i guess i m missing sumthing.if you can help. if you want i cant upload the udf for source term for fluid and solid matrix. bt i dnt knw hw to link it.
it will be really helpful if you can help.
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:17
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
what are you using a UDF for? Fluent will do everything that you need to do regarding porous media.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:25
Default
  #5
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
we need to calculate the heat transfer coefficent between the gas and the porous matrix as the temp will nt be same at any instance and there will be heat transfer taking place between them.
the udf which i wrote are for source term for solid matrix and for fluid region. as we know we need to solve two enegy equation in this case and fluent solves only one equation. my question is how to incorporate the energy equation for solid matrix in porous zone region in order to run the process...
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:34
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
You don't need to write a UDF for the non-equilibrium model. Fluent will do that for you. You just have to turn it on.

I did a whole dissertation based on this.

Are you running an actual lab model too? I did a bench model and used Fluent v's my code to determine which one was better. Fluent wasn't doing the non-equilibrium model when I was doing my research.

The way my code worked for the non-equilibrium model was that I solved for the flow field first, and then brought those into the thermal model. I did not couple them. I had problems with the entrance region of the porous media.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:39
Default
  #7
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
how do you did that bcoz i hv been reading a lot of research papers whr they did the non-equilibrium model using udf.
this is a link to one of that papers...ihope you can help me i m really trying to sove this problem for my masters thesis.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...59431109002427
i hope this will help you understand my problem
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 11:50
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
the best thing I can do is tell you to call Fluent. If you have a 'legal' copy they will help you out. Sometimes it takes a few days, but I have had good experiences with their support.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 12:03
Default
  #9
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
ya i will do that...thanks for you help.
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 12:33
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
like I said earlier, I did a dissertation/journal paper based on the thermal non-equilibrium model and a matrix heat exchanger (basically porous media) and found that the TNE model does a better job of replicating the actually data.

good luck
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 27, 2011, 21:59
Default hi
  #11
Senior Member
 
shoeb khan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
shk12345 is on a distinguished road
hi
Al ready there are lot of posts and discussion here but i wanna add something to it.

Turn off energy equation.
Go the porous zone tab in boundary condition and then click on souce and add the source term there.

I hope that it will help you.
shk12345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2011, 01:48
Default
  #12
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
hi bt hw will it calculate the temperature if i disable the energy equation. as the inlet to porous zone is at high temp and as it passes through the porous zone it temp gets reduced so hw will you exactly do that??
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2011, 10:23
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
shoeb khan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
shk12345 is on a distinguished road
what is the problem that you are facing now.
shk12345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2011, 11:25
Default
  #14
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
i m doing the analysis of stirling inertance pulse tube refrigerator.in this geometry there is a porous zone which i need to model using local non-equilibruim method. it means that when fluid flows through the porous zone the temperature of fluid And the porous material are different and so heat transfer takes place between them.and as we knw fluent solves only one equation of energy. while i need to solve to separate energy equation one for fluid and the other for solid. i have written the code for solid phsae equation along with source term for solid and fluid bt i dnt knw hw we link the both equation in a single zone.i m using k-e model of turbulence
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2011, 21:12
Default
  #15
Senior Member
 
shoeb khan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
shk12345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rohit.mukare7 View Post
i m doing the analysis of stirling inertance pulse tube refrigerator.in this geometry there is a porous zone which i need to model using local non-equilibruim method. it means that when fluid flows through the porous zone the temperature of fluid And the porous material are different and so heat transfer takes place between them.and as we knw fluent solves only one equation of energy. while i need to solve to separate energy equation one for fluid and the other for solid. i have written the code for solid phsae equation along with source term for solid and fluid bt i dnt knw hw we link the both equation in a single zone.i m using k-e model of turbulence
hi
Did you tried to use two different source term in the porous zone.
go to porous tab .click on source. Add two source there and hook your udf there .What is the problem in that case.
And first solve the flow and then add the udf and on the energy equation.

thanks
shk
shk12345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2011, 00:35
Default
  #16
New Member
 
rohit mukare
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: rourkela
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 5
rohit.mukare7 is on a distinguished road
ya i tried that it shows d following error- CAR type invalid pair not match" something like that what does it mean.
how do i first solve the flow. it means first i need to do my analysis only for flow and then again do it by selecting energy eqyation from sove equation box.
rohit.mukare7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2011, 02:46
Default
  #17
Senior Member
 
shoeb khan
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
shk12345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rohit.mukare7 View Post
ya i tried that it shows d following error- CAR type invalid pair not match" something like that what does it mean.
how do i first solve the flow. it means first i need to do my analysis only for flow and then again do it by selecting energy eqyation from sove equation box.
yES TRY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM LIKE THAT WAY AND THEN SEE WHAT RESULTS COME
SOLVE FLOW FIRST
THEN HOOF TH E UDF INTO THE SOURCE TERM
shk12345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2014, 02:18
Default LNTE in flluent 14
  #18
New Member
 
sandy
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
fuzzylogic is on a distinguished road
Hi Guys,

Rohit, u can do this in fluent (at-least version i am using )& no need of UDF.

i am facing similar problem.When i switch to non-thermal model in "Cell zone " i get a message like " U have to create a solid that is spatially coincident with the fluid body ( porous )" and then only all req fields like "heat transfer coeff (b/w solid and gas) "appears. this totally makes sense that energy eq will be solved for solid and fluid separately.

But , in "Boundary Conditions " when u assign the conditions for this solid domain , error message is "Fluid boundary is adjacent to solid body " .

Can u help ??
fuzzylogic is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2014, 09:44
Default
  #19
Senior Member
 
Andrew
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 194
Rep Power: 8
mettler is on a distinguished road
it sounds like you have something wrong in your model - not the BCs. Did you join the fluid and solid boundaries so they see each other?
fuzzylogic likes this.
mettler is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2014, 01:22
Default
  #20
New Member
 
sandy
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
fuzzylogic is on a distinguished road
NO , i just made a cuboid , meshed it (project orineted). and then in cell zone defined it as fluid type > porous .etc
and then when i try to solve for LNTE model the problem as i told earlier arrived.

I am not that much good at Fluent , can u please help me and elaborate your suggestion!
fuzzylogic is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent 12 k-w SST turbulence model DarrenC FLUENT 0 December 13, 2009 09:33
Seeking Macroscopic Particle Model in Fluent bzhang7 FLUENT 0 May 27, 2009 13:36
Thermal non-equilibrium model of porous medium Merlin CFX 0 October 19, 2008 01:51
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02
Covert Star-CD model to FLUENT Lam CD-adapco 6 June 24, 2003 20:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45.