CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > FLUENT

AMG Divergence while Residues Decreasing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 15, 2012, 11:47
Default AMG Divergence while Residues Decreasing
  #1
New Member
 
Jimmy
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
wildabyss is on a distinguished road
Using pressure-based solver (coupled) and setting the under-relaxation factors to:
Momentum: 0.5
Pressure: 0.1

I get Divergence Detected in AMG Solver even while all residues were steadily decreasing (at around 20 to 60 iterations). This happens regardless of whether I use first-order or second-order discretizations.

Is this a sign that mesh quality is bad?
wildabyss is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2012, 15:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky Tran
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 605
Rep Power: 12
LuckyTran is on a distinguished road
This is all assuming that the simulation is setup properly. Double-check to make sure all your boundary conditions and solver options are appropriately selected.

Divergence in the AMG solver is similar to any other divergence problem. It is difficult to say if the mesh is bad or not. Divergence can easily occur even when residuals are dropping; when certain flow quantities are tending towards very huge magnitudes, it can cause the residuals to drop (because of relative magnitudes) and give the false impression that the solution is converging (based on residuals) when in fact it is diverging.

Since the divergence occurred after a number of iterations, it is most likely a flow initialization problem. You initial guess is likely not "good" enough. This is more likely to be the case, since even a bad mesh will produce converged results (although inaccurate) if the initial guess is good enough.

Try to simplify the problem to obtain a loose solution to give it a better initial guess. Try using the segregated solver for a number of iterations first. Try using simpler turbulence models and boundary conditions. Once you have a decent solution, then switch over to the options that you would like to use.

More importantly, it will be a bit of debugging effort, but try to figure out what is actually diverging in the solver by examining solution values.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Divergence in AMG solver! marina FLUENT 14 June 17, 2015 15:31
Divergence detected in AMG solver: ads-0 Patrino FLUENT 4 April 18, 2014 01:53
Quarter Burner mesh with periosic condition SamCanuck FLUENT 2 August 31, 2011 11:34
Error: Divergence detected in AMG solver siri FLUENT 3 October 21, 2010 14:34
reverse flow and divergence in AMG solver MASOUD FLUENT 2 April 2, 2010 08:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:53.