|February 20, 2012, 22:33||
2D LES in FLUENT for a turbulent jet
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 18Rep Power: 6
Can someone please help with the Fluent setting required to perform 2D LES of a turbulent jet at a velocity of 10m/s.
1) My domain size is 1.4 x 2.5 m and size of the inlet is 0.1m built in GAMBIT
2) Boundary conditions are
inlet as velocity inlet
Side walls as pressure outlets
Bottom walls as wall
Top wall (Outlet) as pressure Outlet
3) I am using a pressure based, transient, planar solver
4) Smogrinsky-Lilly Model with default settings.
5) Material is air
6) Under boundary conditions of the velocity inlet a setting of spectral synthesizer is used with turbulent intensity of 5 and hydraulic diameter as 0.1
7) Soultion Methods:
Least Square Cell Based, Standard Pressure, Bounded Central Differencing Momentum and Second Order Implicit for transient formulation
8) Solution Initialized from the Inlet.
9) Time step settings:
No. of time steps: 1000
No. of iteration/time step: 1000
Can someone please point out to me where I am going wrong or what could be suggested for getting the correct flow..
|November 14, 2012, 03:33||
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Graz. Austria
Posts: 12Rep Power: 6
Are you sure you want to do 2D LES? Because you are surely killing a part of physics by doing that. I know it is not much help but just re-consider
|November 14, 2012, 03:44||
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,296Rep Power: 19
This is true. You can not do LES in 2d. But emil, why do you reply such an old thread?
|2d les of turbulent jet, need desperate help!|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|LES of a confined impinging jet reactor..||vishwa||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||8||December 7, 2010 19:11|
|What is "Resolved Reynolds Stress" for LES model in Fluent?||ivanbuz||FLUENT||0||November 1, 2009 17:36|
|LES in Fluent and CFX||taedeneo||Main CFD Forum||2||May 6, 2008 13:53|
|turbulent jet||ramo||Main CFD Forum||1||September 4, 2005 07:43|
|Turbulent Intensity good or bad for a jet||Christian||Main CFD Forum||0||November 19, 2003 06:47|