CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Roughness Models Suggestions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 8, 2005, 06:17
Default Roughness Models Suggestions
  #1
Swarup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi All,

I am solving a problem involving rough surface under laminar flow conditions in a microchannel. In order to model roughness, I can do one of the following.

Explicitly "position" the rough surface randomly on an ideal smooth surface using rectangular/triangular shapes & then simulate them with a well refined mesh at the wall boundary.

OR

Can I use a porous zone to simulate a rough surface effectively? Since, this will represent a momentum sink, I feel it should be possible.

OR

How about using a modified viscosity near the rough surface zone higher than normal viscosity of fluid?

I am unable to make the choice between these alternatives & would appreciate any advice OR other way out for this case.

Thanx a lot for all your co-operation.

Swarup.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 8, 2005, 07:04
Default Re: Roughness Models Suggestions
  #2
ganesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Swarup,

I am not working in this field, but I would like to make the following suggestion.

The presence of roughness are known to trigger transition to turbulence, wherin the viscosity is increased. Thus, it seems quite logical and comparitively easier if you make use of the third option, compared to the others. Also, it is a nice option if you can check if the flow remains fully laminar throughout inspite of the roughness introduced, otherwise the flow would turn more complex.

Regards,

Ganesh
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 8, 2005, 12:54
Default Re: Roughness Models Suggestions
  #3
Swarup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Ganesh,

You are very right about flow transition to turbulent flow but that seems to be a grey area. Actually, I am using FLUENT 6.2 & I doubt whether it (or any other CFD software) will be able to predict this transition. There is only one explicit claim by CFX I guess. Low Re k-e or transitional k-w are limited in their accuracy & only realistic solution strategy is said to be DNS!!

In this situation, I think I will have to stick to steady laminar flow assumption but I am still waiting for some clue. Thanx a lot for your prompt response & suggestions.

Swarup.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
nutRoughWallFunction and Surface Roughness Documented AlanR OpenFOAM Programming & Development 49 July 5, 2016 09:57
Laminar flow and wall roughness junbbung FLUENT 1 December 2, 2012 06:57
NACA standart roughness DAK565656 Main CFD Forum 2 August 24, 2005 00:47
Roughness for K-Omega Turbulence models ratnam CFX 1 July 1, 2005 20:52
Roughness adaptation in CFX 4.4 Bart CFX 1 May 2, 2003 08:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:17.