CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Are these rules by Patankar true?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 11, 2005, 01:29
Default Are these rules by Patankar true?
  #1
zonexo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

i was reading the book by Patankar called Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. He stated some rules regarding the system of equations formed from the momentum equation (and poisson) which i wonder if they're true in all conditions:

1. all coefficients (a_p and neighbor a_nb) must always be positive.

2. a_p = summation of a_nb

I'm now using FVM fractional step. Do these rules apply as well?

thanks

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2005, 01:34
Default Re: Are these rules by Patankar true?
  #2
zonexo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh btw, he also states that coarse grids during computation should still give a physically realistic solution, although it may not be an accurate one.

Is that true as well for all cases, assuming no errors in the programming and logic?

thanks again
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2005, 03:43
Default Re: Are these rules by Patankar true?
  #3
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
These conditions are usually not true when using a high order scheme or in the presence of non-orthogonal terms. They are desirable because they will ensure that quantities remain bounded. That is, the value at P will lie somewhere between the maximum and minimum of its neighbours if there are no source terms.

  Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2005, 04:01
Default Re: Are these rules by Patankar true?
  #4
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I suspect it depends a bit on what is meant by physically realistic. For example, if the flow is close to a mode change, a coarse grid can predict the flow to be in in one mode whereas a fine grid can predict another.

In fact, this occurred in my first CFD prediction which was of a 2D swirling flow in a cylinder: the coarse grid predicted the jet to turn through 90 degrees and follow the head of the combustor whereas the fine grid predicted the jet to enter at an angle and form a closed recirculation between the jet and the head of the combustor.

Of course, the coarse grid flow mode is correct for a slightly higher swirl number but not for the one specified. So is the coarse grid flow to be considered as realistic even though it is quite different from the fine grid flow?
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
True Grid juris_kg Main CFD Forum 0 September 2, 2011 02:45
Should I be using True or Superficial Velocity for Porous Domain? siw CFX 2 November 17, 2010 07:52
problems with simple algorithm(by patankar) jav1984 Main CFD Forum 0 August 19, 2009 12:18
TESTING OF TRUE CONVERGENCE THROUGH FLUX REPORT AKI FLUENT 0 January 18, 2009 05:25
difference between false and true transient mahesh prakash Main CFD Forum 1 January 21, 1999 13:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39.