# Mesh refinement

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 14, 2006, 11:00 Mesh refinement #1 Beginner Guest   Posts: n/a Hi everybody, I've developed a small program to simulate incompressible bidimentional flows using finite differences. I've read that refine mesh near boundaries gives better results but I don't know how to implement this technique. The basic idea is to have the finest mesh near the boundary and increment it. To do this, I think that I need to define a function. But how and what else I need to define? Hope that my question was clear so if you have any good course, paper, link or whatever else on the subject, thank you in advance.

 September 22, 2006, 09:21 Re: Mesh refinement #2 Iain Barton Guest   Posts: n/a If you are dealling with Cartesian meshes (which assumably you must be since using finite differences), the usual rule is to apply an expoential growth of 1.1 to 1.4. i.e. first cell height = h second cell height = h * 1.1 nth cell height = h * 1.1^(n-1) In very old CFD books you see they use functions, to find either the cell height or position. But this doesn't seem to be the current vogue in grid generation. Iain ps (ignoring turbulent flow simulations) you want to refine your grid close to your boundary because as you want the change in "properties" across a cell to remain reasonably constant in magnitude.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21 aeroslacker Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 12 January 19, 2012 04:52 lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09 Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10 Korsh Mik CFX 0 January 11, 2006 08:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:16.