|
[Sponsors] |
September 24, 2006, 18:15 |
Question about meshers
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all, I´m wondering wich is better for structured grids, Gambit or Gridgen? Wich require less work? and what about the learning curve?
Thanks in advance. |
|
September 25, 2006, 03:14 |
Re: Question about meshers
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Personally, I would rather have either CFD-Geom or Icem-CFD Hexa for that. Not that I ever spent the time on Gridgen, so wouldn't comment on where that fits in.
|
|
September 26, 2006, 03:23 |
Re: Question about meshers
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For complex geometries Gridgen is better, but it still requires a lot of work. I would use either ICEM-CFD or ANSA.
|
|
October 6, 2006, 05:09 |
Re: Question about meshers
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The software called cfdesign uses its own automatic mesh generator , not giving much troubles to the user. It uses tetrahedral mesh and prisms at wall elements.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
question about uds | tanven | FLUENT | 2 | July 5, 2015 11:22 |
Unanswered question | niklas | OpenFOAM | 2 | July 31, 2013 16:03 |
Question about Table applicaiton. | universez | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 12, 2010 20:31 |
CHANNEL FLOW: a question and a request | Carlos | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 23, 2002 05:55 |
question | K.L.Huang | Siemens | 1 | March 29, 2000 04:57 |