CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 16, 2006, 08:38
Default Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface flow
  #1
Farhad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi everyone,

What is the benefit of using explicit method in solving momentum equations in free surface flows, most of current softwares solve momentum equations explicitely and they have to use stability conditions in order to set time increment in the range that solution has stability. My question is that why noone (based on my knowledge) has used implicit method (for example SIMPLE algorithm or ...) to solve momentum equations which always is stable and there is no need to use any stability conditions!

I appreciate to receive your idea and comments about this matter.

Thanks Farhad
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2006, 09:00
Default Re: Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface fl
  #2
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's not just a question of stability. You need to ask (1) what time step do I require to resolve the surface gravity waves and (2) what is the effect of the timestepping procedure upon the phase speed and group velocity of the waves.

The solution using implicit methods may work for arbitrary large timesteps but that doesn't mean the solution is accurate. It's also possible that even when the timestepping is sufficiently small (this also goes for explicit methods) that the dispersion relation for the numerical waves may be adversely effected by the time discretization. There's some discussion of this, for the shallow water wave equations, in Wesseling's book "Principles of computational fluid dynamics".
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2006, 09:14
Default Re: Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface fl
  #3
Ford Prefect
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"My question is that why noone (based on my knowledge) has used implicit method..."

Fluent has, and it has the drawbacks pointed out by Tom.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2006, 10:31
Default Re: Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface fl
  #4
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
adding to previous comments,

when u need free surface flow with sharp interface, the stability of interface tracking method (such as VOF, Level set, MAC, ...) usually impose time step limitation (in fact CFL condition). so explict treatment of NS is sufficient.

Recently some time step free method for interface tracking were presented such as particle level set, CIP, ..., but their accuracy (physically correctness) is decreased with using large time step.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 16, 2006, 10:42
Default Re: Explicit vs Implicit method in free surface fl
  #5
Farhad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you all for your helpful comments, I got the point right now.

Farhad
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Free surface flow settubg boundary conditions and plotting velocity profiles prashanthreddyh FLUENT 1 December 2, 2009 11:06
CFX gravity driven free surface flow tutorial mechovator CFX 37 July 27, 2009 10:28
Modeling of free surface flow sam FLUENT 2 October 29, 2003 10:39
CFX 4.4 New free surface option Viatcheslav Anissimov CFX 0 April 3, 2002 05:27
Numerical method for free surface flow? Oleg Melnik Main CFD Forum 4 January 22, 1999 05:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30.