|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have query that, why for comp flow we are using mass flow at inlet and for external flow we can use velo at inlet? pls reply Thanks
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe because in a steady flow computation you eventually want to have mass in = mass out for the internal case, and for an external flow case we don't have that as a hard and fast restriction (i.e. mass can leave along multiple parts of the farfield boundary), and the flow at the boundary can adjust to account for global conservation.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Also note that typically these are among the easiest and most natural quantities to define at those particular boundaries from a problem definition perspective.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| second order schemes | marine | OpenFOAM | 57 | July 12, 2011 13:42 |
| Need help with boundary conditions: open to atmosphere | Wolle | OpenFOAM | 2 | April 11, 2011 07:32 |
| Pressure instability with rhoSimpleFoam | daniel_mills | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 44 | February 17, 2011 17:08 |
| boundary conditions for simpleFoam calculation | foam_noob | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 3, 2010 20:17 |
| Problem with compile the setParabolicInlet | ivanyao | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | September 5, 2008 20:50 |