|
[Sponsors] |
February 25, 2014, 05:25 |
Conservation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 548
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I have an incopressible code that produces correct results when compared to the literature for lid driven cavity flow. I have a few questions though: 1. When I check the continuity equation it seems that it is quite far from zero, in the order of 1e-1 for the cavity flow case. Can a code produce correct results without continuity satisfied? 2. The code is transient and I am not really sure how to judge steady state conditions other than plotting the velocity in a few points. The time derivative is never zero even if the velocities do not change in the monitoring points. 3. With regards to 2. above I wonder if it is good to sum all velocities in all cells and subtract the result from a previous time-step result in order to find whether a steady state has occurred. It seems that I need to include the time-step here in some way as well since a small time-step should yield a smaller change in the flow field. Any suggestions? Thanks. =) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does FEM satisfy conservation locally? | Vino | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 23, 2014 14:14 |
How to call the subroutine to compute two temperature energy conservation equations? | wangweizong | Phoenics | 1 | March 21, 2012 09:27 |
lost of mass conservation | jjchristophe | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2010 05:44 |
Conservation target in transient simulations | Target | CFX | 12 | September 25, 2006 07:20 |
Mass conservation | Diego Nogueira | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 30, 2004 15:50 |