CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

How long should the message index be?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 26, 1998, 11:20
Default How long should the message index be?
  #1
Jonas Larsson / Forum Admin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The message index for this discussion forum is getting a bit long - it currently has about 420 entries. For the moment the maximum number of messages allowed is set to 500 and when we reach that limit older messages will be automatically archived in a read-only forum. This archival forum will be available for browsing and keyword searches, but no one can post any new messages to it.

Do you think that a max limit of 500 messages is good? Or is the message index too long already perhaps?

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 1998, 14:01
Default Re: How long should the message index be?
  #2
Kiran
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have only recently started reading the discussions on this forum and find it extremely informative and stimulating.

It seems that 500 messages may be a good number. However, since the older messages to get archived (or are planned to be,) one can make an argument for a smaller number of messages to be current. I was thinking along keeping messages by months...i.e. keep the messages of the present and immediate previous month current. Or, if required, previous two months, depending on what the general opinion is. So, for example, as soon as Sept 1 comes along, the messages of Aug and July will also be on the current list. All of June and previous months will get archived etc.

-Kiran Kumar
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 1998, 14:50
Default Re: How long should the message index be?
  #3
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, we could just as well archive messages based on how old they are. As you say 1 or 2 months would be good with the current traffic I think. However, I don't like the buildt in instability of the time-based archiving approach: few messages -> few visitors -> few new posts -> longer time between posts -> archiving gives even fever messages. The opposite happens if traffic goes up and we'd have to reduce the time-limit in that case. An archiving criteria based on the number of messages is more stable and robust so to say

But I'm open to suggestions. My vote goes to an automatic archiving limit of 500 messages. If anyone else has any good arguments for another limit please let me know. I agree with you that a lower limit could be better - discussion threads tend to die when they are far down the index anyway.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 1998, 15:07
Default Re: How long should the message index be?
  #4
Kiran
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jonas,

I don't think there should be any worry about lack of traffic due to the time-based approach! If you notice, in fact, the oldest message is around late June. So its almost the same or perhaps in fact, more,..i.e. messages from (2 past months + current month) >= 500 (considering its over 400 right now.)

However, your point on the possibility of "lean" periods and your envisioned consequences could be a reality.

-Kiran
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 1998, 15:10
Default Re: How long should the message index be?
  #5
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Keeping the number of messages to the maximum ( in your case ,500 ) will make more information available to more people. If it's possible to add new comments ( or answers ) to the archivied questions, you will have a very valuable database in the future. If it's possible to bring an old archivied question alive again, new comments and answers can be continued from there. Otherwise, the same old question has to be asked for a second time.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Doxygen documentation Tanay OpenFOAM Installation 9 September 23, 2011 11:40
OpenFOAM install on Ubuntu Natty 11.04 bkubicek OpenFOAM 13 May 26, 2011 05:48
OpenFOAM-1.5-dev svn revision 1438: libOpenFOAM does not compile in SP 4xF OpenFOAM Bugs 3 October 16, 2009 05:35
Missing math.h header Travis FLUENT 4 January 15, 2009 11:48
Error message in CFX-10 CFDworker CFX 2 October 12, 2007 07:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45.