Mach number and flow compressibility

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 October 23, 1999, 15:56 Mach number and flow compressibility #1 Guosheng Kang Guest   Posts: n/a I was told that for combustion in industrial furnace at regular pressure (P is around 1 atm), the gaseous fuel and oxygen or air is usually introduced into the combustion chamber at a speed less than 120 m/s, so that the Mach number is less than 0.3, thus the noise will meet the regulation. I have no experience of operating a burner at high speeds, so I need advise from you all on two questions. (1). Does anyone know that the speed described above exceeds 120 m/s in practice? (2). Assume that u=140 m/s causes the Mach number is exactly 0.30, then for u=139 m/s the imcompressible flow model is used, but for u= 141 m/s a compressible flow model should be used, is there a big jump across this point? Thanks. Guosheng Kang

 October 24, 1999, 17:18 Re: Mach number and flow compressibility #2 clifford bradford Guest   Posts: n/a for combustion you should probably use compressible flow to take into acc't bouyancy effect unless you're using say Boussinesq approximation. i can't answer (1) but the answer to (2) is the jump shouldn't be too big.

 October 25, 1999, 14:50 Re: Mach number and flow compressibility #3 Demselles Hollowajiwoak Guest   Posts: n/a Instead of asking if the difference between M=.299 and M=.301 is siginificant, you should consider if assuming M=.299<0.3 is incompressible just because it is less than 0.3. M=0.3 is not a singularity about which compressibility effects change dramatically. It is a "rule of thumb" that must be used carefully when M is very near 0.3. I would also agree that buoyancy effects should be considered for this process. Regards, Demselles Hollowajiwoak

 October 25, 1999, 15:00 Re: Mach number and flow compressibility #4 Adrin Gharakhani Guest   Posts: n/a You can obviously not use the "incompressible" flow assumption in the case of combustion - as metnioned earlier. What you really mean to say is that you are using a low Mach number approximation of compressible flow - which looks like the incompressible N-S equation (but you can still allow for density variation). The order of accuracy of this "model" is Mach**2 - so for most practical problems you're safe even at as high as Ma=0.4 (though the norm is Ma=0.3) Adrin Gharakhani

 October 26, 1999, 12:51 Re: Mach number and flow compressibility #5 Guosheng Kang Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you all!

 October 26, 1999, 15:56 Re: Mach number and flow compressibility #6 Rainer Kurz Guest   Posts: n/a Item 2: No. Gas flow is compressible at any Mach number. However, below Mach 0.3, the error by using the assumption of incompressible flow is typically tolerable.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Shenren_CN Main CFD Forum 0 April 29, 2011 21:07 lost.identity Main CFD Forum 0 November 28, 2010 05:44 Logesh Main CFD Forum 12 June 30, 2003 09:43 David Shkval FLUENT 2 April 14, 2002 07:30 Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:01.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top