|
[Sponsors] |
turbulent mixing controlled reaction vs. chemical kinetics controlled reaction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 31, 1999, 20:46 |
turbulent mixing controlled reaction vs. chemical kinetics controlled reaction
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In general, turbulent-mixing(or diffusion) controlled reaction mechanism is treated as 'more important' in the high temperature reactor including combustor. So, sometimes, chemical kinetics controlled reaction mechanism(Arrhenius type reaction mechanism) can be neglected. And mixture fraction approach with prescribed chmistry, or similar concept, can be used to predict the flow field with combustion.
Would you let me know, or introduce reference(s) for the guideline of high temperature range where chemically controlled reaction mechanism can be generally neglected ? I am only interested in the gaseous combustion for this question. Sincerely |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? | NewKid | OpenFOAM | 18 | January 20, 2011 16:55 |
combustion, chemical reaction or turbulent source? | sogen | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 29, 2005 22:41 |
chemical reaction - decompostition | La S. Hyuck | CFX | 1 | May 23, 2001 00:07 |
chemical reaction - howto | Dan Sorensen | Siemens | 1 | February 21, 2000 09:20 |
CFD of mixing with chemical reaction | Dr. Eng. Mounir BOUAIFI | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 11, 1999 08:30 |