# Solving 2-d problems by 3-d solver

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 7, 2000, 05:12 Solving 2-d problems by 3-d solver #1 eddy Guest   Posts: n/a Can we solve 2-d CFD problems by using 3-d CFD codes with periodical boundary condition in third direction?

 September 7, 2000, 05:40 Re: Solving 2-d problems by 3-d solver #2 Zhengtong Xie Guest   Posts: n/a As my experience(use a 3-d code to envaluate the lift of 2-d aerofoil), I let the length of computaion domain in the third direction to be much biger than the other two directions, then I averaged the third direction. It is expensive but maybe much reliable.

 September 7, 2000, 06:01 Re: Solving 2-d problems by 3-d solver #3 D.M. Lipinski Guest   Posts: n/a You should use symmetry conditions (zero normal derivatives) in the third direction and not the periodic bounday conditions. The third velocity component should be set to zero (Dirichlet condition). regards DML

 September 7, 2000, 06:15 Re: Solving 2-d problems by 3-d solver #4 Dietmar Giebert Guest   Posts: n/a If there is a real 2D configuration you can solve the problem with a 3D-code by setting symmetry boundary conditions at the surfaces in the third direction. Periodic boundary conditions are not really appropriate because this kind of BC does not imply zero mass flux over these surfaces.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33 heavy_user OpenFOAM 16 February 11, 2012 06:15 lordvon OpenFOAM 14 October 27, 2010 11:13 renyun0511 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 19, 2009 03:11 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:20.