CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

on fully developed duct flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 19, 2001, 22:21
Default on fully developed duct flow
  #1
yfyap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi there,

i'm interested in solving for u,v,w,P for fully developed flow only in a straight duct. the problem is formulated in primitve variables and all derivatives with respect to z(streamwise direction) are dropped except for the streamwise pressure gradient. it seems, by doing these, u and v are independent of w, is this true?

if this were true, then, can we solve for u,v,P using the continuity equation ,x and y momentum equations first? these equations would resemble those for cavity driven flow except all those velocities at the boundaries remain zero. then, would it possible to get trivial solution? after attaining the correct u,v,P, w is obtained from z-momentum equation.

thanks.

regards, yfyap
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 20, 2001, 01:10
Default Re: on fully developed duct flow
  #2
S.P.Asok
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I keen to go through experts' views on this.Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2001, 15:09
Default Re: on fully developed duct flow
  #3
I. Dotsikas
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fully developed duct flow means that your velocity w (in the main direction) varies only across ; and not along the duct :dw/dz = 0 and dw/dx <>0 ; dw/dy<>0 ; dP/dz = 0. All other derivatives of the x and y momentum equations are zero!!!

You get the trivial solution u= v= dP/dx = dP/dy = 0

best regards

I. Dotsikas
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 22, 2001, 21:43
Default Re: on fully developed duct flow
  #4
yfyap
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dear I. Dotsikas, from the physics of the problem, we know that u(x,y), v(x,y), w(x,y) and P can be written as

P = P1(z) + P2(x,y),

the flow along z is driven by constant pressure gradient, so, dP/dz = dP1/dz = constant, is this right? i feel that the momentum equations should look like

udu/dx + vdu/dy = -1/rho * dP/dx + nu * [ d^2u/dx^2 + d^2u/dy^2 ] ---(1)

udv/dx + vdv/dy = -1/rho * dP/dy + nu * [ d^2v/dx^2 + d^2v/dy^2 ] ---(2)

udw/dx + vdw/dy = -1/rho * dP/dz + nu * [ d^2w/dx^2 + d^2w/dy^2 ] ---(3)

and the continuity equation:

du/dx + dv/dy = 0 ----(4)

from (1) to (4), it seems (3) is uncoupled from (1), (2) and (4). furthermore, i feel that solely solving (1), (2) and (4) with zero velocity at the boundaries, would render a trivial solution.

please explain what is meant by the statement "All other derivatives of the x and y momentum equations are zero!!!", i do not quite get it.

thanks. regards, yfyap
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2001, 11:58
Default Re: on fully developed duct flow
  #5
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Before writing off the W equation consider what gives rise to your dp/dz.

If you want something interesting to happen in the plane of the duct then may I suggest making your diffusion coefficient variable (e.g. a turbulence model), varying the density (e.g. extracting heat from the walls) or adding a transverse pressure gradient (e.g. curving the duct).

If you want to investigate such parabolic approachs further a good place to start might be the old genmix program:

http://www.cham.co.uk/website/new/genmix/code.htm

and the large body of associated literature.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2001, 07:49
Default Re: on fully developed duct flow
  #6
vassilis sakalis
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
in the fully developed region of a straight duct, the axial pressure gradient remains constant. As we see from the n-s equation, cross section velocities are independent of the axial velocity. If someone wants to solve such a problem, the only way is to set initial the axial pressure gradient and to geuess cross sections pressure gradients dp/dx and dp/dy with the other varriables zero (eg:inlet velocities). Then solve the axial n-s equation to obtain axial velocity and solve the cross n-s equations to obtain cross velocities which are not zero because of nonzero pres.gradients. By using a pressure correction technique you can correct the obtained cross section velocities and pressures from the continuity equation. Those corrected values will be set as initial values to solve the n-s equation again till convergence. At the end of thenumerical procedure you will see that the cross section velocities have very low values, but their sign depend especially on the sign of the guess cross section pressure gradients and they are independent of the axial velocity. This problem has not unique solution. The best approach of such a problem is to solve the developing n-s equation in order to obtain the fully developed valuues of the velocities. In this case, the cross section velocities are coupled with axial velocitie by both momentum and continuity equations
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2012, 10:59
Default thermal fully developed
  #7
New Member
 
Ayoub
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 4
AYOUB is on a distinguished road
Hi
I need to reach fully develop flow in microchannel(D=100 micrometer,L=1mm)
q=500,Re=100 to 1000,Tin=300,working fluid is water.
i can not reach thermal fully developed,i don't know why even when i apply Le=.05 Re D Pr
would you please show me a solution?
AYOUB is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fully developed flow in Star-cd SMM STAR-CD 3 September 9, 2011 15:54
Fully Developed Flow in Star-cd SMM STAR-CD 0 September 5, 2011 22:08
Fully developed flow profile icfd Main CFD Forum 3 May 20, 2009 22:21
Writing an expression for fully developed flow! Usman CFX 12 December 20, 2007 12:26
udf for 3D laminar fully developed flow salman FLUENT 0 November 9, 2006 22:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06.