CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 14, 2002, 12:54
Default Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
  #1
Wen Long
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear friends:

I'm working on a nearshore Boussinesq wave model. Currently I have a problem with numerical stability for some cases. In order to damp out small scale noises, I want to use biharmonic damping term with an artificial viscosity given in light of Smagorinsky (1963) and (1993).

While I'm trying to implement it on a curvilinear coordinate, can anyone point me to a reference of biharmonic term calculation in general coordinates? Since it appears to me that the biharmonic operator \nabla^4 in non-orthogornal coordinates is quite complicated.

Thanks,

Wen

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2002, 15:48
Default Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
  #2
Kalyan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you introduce a biharmonic operator, you are changing the order of the PDEs. You would need additional boundary conditions.

If the biharmonic term is merely an artifact that the numerical equations need, please make sure that the term zeros out near the boundaries. The Smagorinsky viscosity (I guess you are refering to the LES model) does not (and does need to) go to zero at the boundaries.

You may find the discrete biharmonic operator on general coordinates in papers involving transonic flow solvers.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2002, 23:39
Default Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
  #3
wen long
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Kalyan:

Thank you very much. I wasn't aware that I'll have to zero out the viscosity near boundaries. That could be hard if my domain has arbitrarily shaped islands in side.

Yes my biharmonic damping will be only artificial part. Many people do Smagorinsky closure in LES and Large Scale Ocean Turbulence, but papers I got are too concise to gain much out of them.

You mentioned transonic flow solvers, can you point it to me more clearly? I'll try to find sth in my lib.

Thanks again,

Wen
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2002, 05:50
Default Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
  #4
versi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
-coef *( Q_{i-2}-4 Q_{i-1} +6 Q_i +4 Q_{i+1} +Q_{i+2}) for equal sized grid. But coef is quite empirical.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 15, 2002, 05:54
Default Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
  #5
versi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sorry , there should be "-" before "4".
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Herschel-Bulkley non-Newtonian viscosity model has term with sign error pbryant OpenFOAM Bugs 5 June 18, 2013 23:53
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Hyper viscosity model Pascal_doran OpenFOAM Programming & Development 2 December 1, 2010 20:51
Questions about Cross-WLF viscosity model in interHeatFoam awacs OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 October 21, 2009 02:10
Smagorinsky Sub-grid Model Craig Johansen CFX 1 October 13, 2004 03:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:44.