# SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 7, 2003, 12:58 SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates #1 zouchu Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I have some problems on SIMPLE algorithm used in 3D r-\theta-z cylindrical coordinates. (1) About the SIMPLE used in staggered grid for 3D cylindrical coordinates. I have written a code, but the code is not converged! and I have wasted somedays on it, but I don't know why. In fact, I have implemented a implicit SIMPLE code in collocated grid, and a explicit projection method code in staggered grid, and these two codes is very good. Are there someone who has successed to apply SIMPLE to staggered grid in 3D cylindrical coordinates, and are there some tricks in the code? (2) About the Krylov method combined with SIMPLE algorithm on collocated grid. I know the combination implementation for staggered grid because of the mass flux can be calculated by the velocity directly, but for collocated grid, I have to using another varibles (FORTRAN) to save the mass flux after pressure correction, which is different from that caculated by the velocity directly! I want to know how to treat the mass flux when the Krylov method combined with SIMPLE algorithm on collocated grid? Thanks in advance! zouchu

January 20, 2014, 18:02
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates
#2
New Member

Ali Farahani
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Quote:
 Originally Posted by zouchu ;25592 Hi, I have some problems on SIMPLE algorithm used in 3D r-\theta-z cylindrical coordinates. (1) About the SIMPLE used in staggered grid for 3D cylindrical coordinates. I have written a code, but the code is not converged! and I have wasted somedays on it, but I don't know why. In fact, I have implemented a implicit SIMPLE code in collocated grid, and a explicit projection method code in staggered grid, and these two codes is very good. Are there someone who has successed to apply SIMPLE to staggered grid in 3D cylindrical coordinates, and are there some tricks in the code? (2) About the Krylov method combined with SIMPLE algorithm on collocated grid. I know the combination implementation for staggered grid because of the mass flux can be calculated by the velocity directly, but for collocated grid, I have to using another varibles (FORTRAN) to save the mass flux after pressure correction, which is different from that caculated by the velocity directly! I want to know how to treat the mass flux when the Krylov method combined with SIMPLE algorithm on collocated grid? Thanks in advance! zouchu

Hi
I have the same problem too. in fact I have descritized momentum eq. in cylindrical coordinates in implicit mode. but my error in pressure correction do not converge any way.
I wanna know may be there is some common mistake that I've forgot to consider.
does implicit or explicit mode of discritization have any special effect of converging the results?

any help would be appreciated.
ali.farahani87@gmail.com

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post falopsy Main CFD Forum 44 January 15, 2014 03:17 TerraVici Main CFD Forum 4 April 9, 2012 05:22 dariush Main CFD Forum 2 October 17, 2007 07:21 Franz Wingelhofer CFX 0 December 28, 1999 08:46 Jonathan Castro Main CFD Forum 3 December 10, 1999 05:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:08.