CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

LU-SSOR / any experience?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 30, 2003, 11:33
Default LU-SSOR / any experience?
  #1
A. Pechloff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello.

Concerning 3D compressible turbulent Navier-Stokes flow about aircraft wings, I'm employing an implict LU-SSOR method (finite volume) coupled with a multigrid algorithm. The Spalart- Allmaras tubulence model is implemented. In order to resolve the boundary layer an off body distance of 10^-5 root chord length is selected for the first grid line, resulting in high aspect ratio cells surrounding the wing.

My problem:

In order to obtain a convergent steady state solution (in single grid mode) the implicit dampening parameter (omega) has to be set to a very high value (>20) . In the literature one usually finds values smaller than <2. For my case (>20) the time step of the LU-SSOR scheme is reduced dramatically, resulting in slow convergence. When reducing omega, convergence accelerates, but sudden instabilities in the wing wake occur down the line (residual 10^-3), destroying the solution. I compensate for this by employing the multigrid method. As the grid is restricted, omega can be reduced.

My Questions:

1. Has anyone experienced similar problems, when coupling the S/A turbulence model with LU-SSOR and Multigrid?

2. I'd like to implemented a cell adaptive or flow field adaptive omega. Has this ever been done before (literature)?

3. Would artificial dissipative terms be helpful in stabilizing the solution, eventhough this is not an explicit scheme?

4. Is it wise to solve the S/A turbulence model in the same way as the RANS equations (Roe/Chakravarty)?

Your help is appreciated.

Alexander.

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any experience with rhoPorousMRFPimpleFoam? Applicable for turbomachinery? astein OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 December 19, 2014 05:00
Tired of employers focus on commercial code experience Steven P. Lounge 21 May 14, 2014 09:43
My experience Installing Elmer (Open Source Multi physics programme) on Linux Ahmed Main CFD Forum 3 August 10, 2010 13:42
Any experience with CONVERT_NAME_S2U Cardero CFX 0 July 28, 2009 16:03
Anybody has experience implenting S-A model? Tom Main CFD Forum 1 April 7, 2001 02:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:09.