CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

FEM and CFD coupling

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 29, 1999, 07:33
Default FEM and CFD coupling
  #1
DEMERSSEMAN Rémi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We are looking for the way to use results of a structure modeling by softs like Abaqus or Nastran in a CFD soft, like Fire or Fluent, and also the other way. We aim at studying a seal in a fluid with a fluid-structure modeling, by iterating the CFD->FEM->CFD calculations.

The problem is to get the pressure from the CFD to the FEM and make calculate the FEM soft, then get the displacement and make the CFD calculate with it.

There seems to be just a few studies done on that subject. Any help would be welcomed. Even just an idea of who made such study or the name of someone able to answer our questions.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 1999, 08:20
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #2
Joern Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have a look at

http://www.cd.co.uk/news/html/nlett.htm

Coupled Fluid/Structure Interactions - STAR-CD links to stress analysis codes.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 29, 1999, 12:04
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #3
Raza Mirza
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Intersting problem. Since the problem seems to be strongly coupled, you may want to treat it as such. Or you may choose the approach you have suggested and look for a way to couple these solutions externally.

CFD Research Corporation (http://www.cfdrc.com) provides you with solutions for both the above approaches.

CFD-FEMSTRESS and CFD-ACE+ provide users with a fully coupled way of handling fluid-strucutural interaction problems. CFD-ACE+ is the advanced multi-purpose CFD code from CFD Research Corporation and CFD-FEMSTRESS is the FEM software that works with it (or as stand-alone for that matter). The combination has been used by our customers and by us to study problems such flow through mechanical heart valves, flow through valves in compressors, inflation of airbags.

For the other altenative, CFD Research Corporation has developed MDICE (Multi-DIsiplinary Computing Environment). This is a way let independent codes (CFD, FEM or other) to communicate.

If you (or someone else) need more information on CFD-FEMSTRESS or MDICE, please contact me directly at rmm@cfdrc.com. You are also welcome to visit CFD Reserch website at http://www.cfdrc.com, and can also contact us from there.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 1999, 03:47
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #4
Rashid Faizullin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I worked under problem - aeroelasticity of turbomachines where are needs for calculations of unsteady forces from flow to cascdes. I did some codes for calculations of unsteady transonic flows in cascades (flows and pressures) then result was applied for structural analysis. By way CFD method was FEM too.

You can see article on the English www.univer.omsk.su/~rtf/AI11.TEX

Also I should say - of course FEM codes is beatiful thing but more important for application is correct mathematical approach for real( your ) problem.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 1999, 14:57
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #5
Tim Cowan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There have been LOTS of studies on this very subject. Try a literature search for CFD/Aeroelasticity to find relevant fluid-structure coupling methods. We have a code here that was developed in house called STARS which seemlessy couples the FEM structures to a CFD model for an aeroelastic analysis. You should be able to find some relevant technical papers by Gupta, K.K. (primary developer) and also Arena, A.S. on our particular methodology to solve the coupled problem.

I anticipate that that you will have some difficulty in coupling two separate off-the-shelf commercial packages unless you have source code to make modifications and interface between the two. You should probably look into getting one package that has both modules and solves the coupled problem already (see previous posts for recommendations). Otherwise, you will be stuck running a single iteration with each separate code and writing some sort of batch code to pipe the outputs back and forth. This will be VERY slow. Ideally you would like to only initialize the problem once and do all of the iterations internally.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 1999, 15:08
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #6
Eric Grald
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Recently Prof. F. Grosjean and his student, S. Sauvage, of ENSIETA in France have validated an iterative approach to modeling fluid/structure interaction using Abaqus and FLUENT. The study was presented at the 1998 Abaqus Users' Conference and a summary was published in Fall/Winter 1998 Fluent Newsletter. You can view this summary on-line at http://www.fluent.com/news/fall98/abaqus.htm.

Fluent will be introducing a coupled fluid/structure interaction capability in its FIDAP CFD software in May 1999. A simultaneous solution for the fluid flow field, stress/deflection in the solid and shape/position of the domain will be computed. The advantage obviously is the elimination of the data transfer between codes.

Eric Grald, Fluent Inc.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 1999, 16:34
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #7
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). The problem of a seal is different from that of a vibrating airfoil. The deformation of the seal and the change in the gap size could be important factors in determining the structure side and the fluid side calculations. (2). Unless it is a very thin seal, the seal will reach a static shape and the flow around and through the gap will also reach a steady-state condition. (3). So, I think, from practical point of view, a couple of iterations should be enough to derive the final shape of the seal. (4). On the other hand, a vibrating airfoil may require direct coupling formulation between the structure and the fluid because of the transient nature of the problem.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 1999, 17:20
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #8
Phil Greenfield
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been working on this problem for a squeeze flow application where the pressure field interacts and deforms the bounding surface. I've written a hybrid program in Matlab that mixes a finite volume technique to determine the pressure field and a spectral method to calculate the deformation in the bounding surface. It's basically an iterative process around equilibrium conditions in the coupled set of equations. I myself feel the need to move over to a commercial package, especially as the problem becomes more complex using viscoelastic fluid mediums. I'd be interested in hearing any success you have. later, Phil
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 1999, 04:23
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #9
Joern Beilke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Have a look at

www.pallas.de/cispar

There you find a description of the COCOLIB library which allows coupling between CFD and FEA codes.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 1999, 02:37
Default Re: FEM and CFD coupling
  #10
Rémi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
COCOLIB provides with the organisation between the codes - including the data transfert - but not the needed datas' transformation from one mesh's nodes to the other one. I mean, in the case of Finite Volumes coupled to Finite Elements method, no node correspond. This seems to be actually the main problem in my case. Rémi
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FDM vs FVM vs FEM in CFD analysis ck5285 FLOW-3D 1 September 1, 2009 10:51
FEM for CFD ted Main CFD Forum 7 August 12, 2004 12:23
FEM or FVM for CFD Astrid Main CFD Forum 18 December 15, 2000 01:02
FEM methods used in CFD? R.V.Ramkumar Main CFD Forum 3 August 5, 1999 02:02
CFD to FEM V. Worbington Main CFD Forum 1 July 21, 1998 15:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:01.