|
[Sponsors] |
March 17, 2004, 16:41 |
Generalized Math. Form of Turbulence
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In one of his posts below, Tom says as a reply to "Sci":
"... Actually there is no accepted "generalized mathematics" of turbulence only conjectures and oversimplifications.... You also need to remember that chaos is not turbulence..." ---------------------------- Opps. Tom, are you a scholar professor? There isn't a "generalized mathematical form of fluid flow turbulence? Sorry - what equations are you "trying" to solve when you study on a turbulent flow? NAVIER-STOKES (or simply F=MxA)... Do you NOT consider this is the "most" generalized form of turbulence mathematics? Well, then, you are far from classical mechanics. Anyways - I guess you meant somethings else? My point is that ANY ATTEMPT to simplify a general turbulence equations by dimension reduction will cause big big errors ... AND.. as you know all research centers, universities, scholars, professors, etc are playing with simplified equation forms of generalized form of turbulence mathematics. Therefore, all of these today scholars are on the wrong way. Pity them and their students. You all have spent your life on the wrong ways of your master scholars/professors. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 14:18 |
Question on Turbulence Intensity | Eric | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2012 04:30 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 09:52 |
Math form expressed in OpenFoam | vvqf | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 4 | November 10, 2005 09:38 |