|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Juan
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi everybody
I am a bit new in CFD and I am trying to learn it as much as I can. I am analyzing a 3D pipe in order to determine head losses. I am not able to establish the boundary layer for all the volume of the pipe. I have done it for the two faces but not for the perimeter of the pipe. Which mesh method do yo think is the most adequate for a 3D pipe? Could anybody help me, please? Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
multi-block structured method will be a proper choice.
another choice which easily gives you a high quality mesh as well as a very good control of boundary layer, is hexaderal mesh. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pipe flow- meshing in ICEM CFD? | Nikhil | CFX | 2 | February 29, 2008 06:14 |
| Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
| CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 17:25 |
| ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
| Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |