CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Conservative form

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 9, 2011, 20:58
Default Conservative form
New Member
bardiche's Avatar
Guanqun Gai
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
bardiche is on a distinguished road
Hi all, new to forum here so iam bit tip-toey :P

But i guess this is the best place to ask something like this so here goes

In the Lax-Friedrichs two-step scheme (where n is the time step and i is the spatial step of the discretization)

u(n+1/2,i+1/2) = 1/2[u(n,i+1) + u(n,i)] - (dt/2dx) [f(n,i+1)-f(n,i)]

u(n+1,i) = 1/2[u(n+1/2,i+1/2) + u(n+1/2,i-1/2)] - (dt/2dx) [f(n+1/2,i+1/2)-f(n+1/2,i-1/2)]

how would one manipulate this two step scheme to write the Lax-Friedrich scheme in Conservative form

u(n+1,i) = u(n,i) - (dt/dx) [f*(i+1/2)-f*(i-1/2)]

f* being the numerical fluxes

i have attempted combining the two steps of the scheme and trying to arrive at the conservative form but the expression seems to get quite messy and i cannot see to find the expression for f*

many thanks

bardiche is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rewriting twoPhaseEulerFoam in conservative form alberto OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 27 Yesterday 05:32
Conservative and non-conservative form of NS eqns dtaydas Main CFD Forum 0 February 23, 2010 13:48
RPM in Wind Turbine Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05
conservative, non conservative form???? vijesh joshi Main CFD Forum 4 March 16, 2006 00:10
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26.