|April 6, 2011, 12:02||
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 471Rep Power: 11
I'm putting together a CFD code, called Aero Troll CFD http://hegedusaero.com/software.html, for educational and hobbyist use. The code is compressible (i.e. subsonic, transonic, and supersonic) The code can only run on one machine and does not include chemistry or moving bodies. I live in the U.S.A. I've called the state department and they have requested that I submit a commodity jurisdiction (CJ) application to determine whether my code is covered by the U.S. Munitions List. The code and intended use was described to the state department over phone and emails. Unfortunately, and this applies to the majority of CFD codes, they can be used for the design of UAVs, Missiles, and Launch Vehicles. I've read the International Traffic in Arms Regulations and I'll admit I'm not clear on all the legalize. I'm not a lawyer. However, I figure the state department would not ask for a commodity jurisdiction application unless there was a reason. I gather it takes quite a bit of resources for them to process one.
So, I will need to do a CJ and have some questions.
Are commercial codes such as Fluent/CFX, Star-CD, or CFD++ ITAR?
Does anyone have any advice or input?
|August 22, 2011, 10:07||
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14Rep Power: 9
I saw you linked the Analytical Methods case in one of the other threads. Seems they used dual-use CFD code for "defense services" (and they exported code that was specifically modified to model military aircraft chaff separation). That doesn't sound like what you are trying to do. IANAL, but these guys are:
On the commodity jurisdiction, that's the process if there's doubts on whether a thing is on the USML; you called with doubts, triggering the process...
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD||CD adapco Group Marketing||CD-adapco||0||February 13, 2002 13:23|
|Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001||John C. Chien||Main CFD Forum||36||January 24, 2001 22:10|
|ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001||Chris R. Kleijn||Main CFD Forum||0||August 21, 2000 04:49|
|Since Last June||John C. Chien||Main CFD Forum||3||July 12, 1999 09:38|
|Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package.||Tareq Al-shaalan||Main CFD Forum||10||June 12, 1999 23:27|