|April 27, 2011, 04:26||
advantage of using Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian formulation?
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12Rep Power: 7
I have a fairly fundamental question. When simulating a problem which involves deforming grid such fluid-structure interaction problem, I see some researcher (ex. Farhat) using Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation while others (ex. Visbal) using "standard" NS eq. in strong conservation law (SCLF). I believe, in the end, both formulation do same thing. Is there an advantage of using ALE?
Please correct me if I am wrong. From my understanding, ALE includes the grid velocity in the total derivative while the SCLF includes the grid velocities in the grid metrics. Are there more "deeper" or fundamental difference between the two formulations?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|lagrangian and eulerian representaions||kakollu||Main CFD Forum||14||February 12, 2010 12:35|
|Eulerian and Lagrangian||SSS||Main CFD Forum||1||February 23, 2007 08:15|
|lagrangian vs eulerian approach||leopoldo luongo||CFX||1||June 19, 2006 10:12|
|Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Methods||Soheyl||Main CFD Forum||1||June 12, 2006 03:42|
|Comparison between Eulerian and Lagrangian Models||Ricardo Damian||CFX||0||September 3, 2001 19:13|