CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

turbulence model for ribbed channel heat transfer

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 31, 2011, 09:47
Smile turbulence model for ribbed channel heat transfer
  #1
New Member
 
Kan Rui
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
keryfluid is on a distinguished road
hello everyone,
Recently I've been working on ribbed channel flow,and heat transfer is of great importance in this problem. I found that heat transfer coefficient distribution calculated by the k-e model (with enhanced wall treatment) are not quite satisfying compared to the experimental results. I wonder if there's some logic to guide me to choose a proper turbulence model, or I can only try them one by one?
Your remark are highly appreciated!
keryfluid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2011, 01:40
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 7
cfd_newbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by keryfluid View Post
hello everyone,
Recently I've been working on ribbed channel flow,and heat transfer is of great importance in this problem. I found that heat transfer coefficient distribution calculated by the k-e model (with enhanced wall treatment) are not quite satisfying compared to the experimental results. I wonder if there's some logic to guide me to choose a proper turbulence model, or I can only try them one by one?
Your remark are highly appreciated!
hi,
Ribbed channel flow is a very new area to me can you give more details like the Reynolds number involved, details of operating conditions geometry etc. ?
Raashid
cfd_newbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2011, 21:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kan Rui
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
keryfluid is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfd_newbie View Post
hi,
Ribbed channel flow is a very new area to me can you give more details like the Reynolds number involved, details of operating conditions geometry etc. ?
Raashid
It's a serpentine channel used for internal cooling of gas turbine blade. Reynolds number depend on the hydraulic diameter is around 50,000, rib height is approximately 0.1 Dh, rib pitch is 10 Dh. The channel is square with an aspect ratio from 1/4~4 and it may have a 90-degree or 180-degree turning section. Rotational effects is not considered yet.
keryfluid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 00:16
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 7
cfd_newbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by keryfluid View Post
It's a serpentine channel used for internal cooling of gas turbine blade. Reynolds number depend on the hydraulic diameter is around 50,000, rib height is approximately 0.1 Dh, rib pitch is 10 Dh. The channel is square with an aspect ratio from 1/4~4 and it may have a 90-degree or 180-degree turning section. Rotational effects is not considered yet.
Did you try the SST turbulence model, this is generally the safest bet and nice starting point. What Y+ are you using right now ? What is the mach number involved ?
Raashid
cfd_newbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2011, 09:53
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Kan Rui
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
keryfluid is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfd_newbie View Post
Did you try the SST turbulence model, this is generally the safest bet and nice starting point. What Y+ are you using right now ? What is the mach number involved ?
Raashid
Mach number is near 0.03 so I think it's a incompressible problem. Y+ at most part of the wall is around 3, except for some point on top of the rib ,where yplus can be 10.
keryfluid is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 01:02
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 7
cfd_newbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by keryfluid View Post
Mach number is near 0.03 so I think it's a incompressible problem. Y+ at most part of the wall is around 3, except for some point on top of the rib ,where yplus can be 10.
I think since it's an internal flow than you can increase your mesh count (I hope you have sufficient hardware resources) so that nowhere the Y+ is more than 2. Once you have new finer mesh you can "solve to wall" instead of going for wall functions.
cfd_newbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 06:36
Default
  #7
azt
Member
 
allan thomson
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: scotland
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 8
azt is on a distinguished road
hi

you probably need to go to a low re turbulence model with Y+ around 1, k-w-sst is a good model.

Experience would suggest that the metal temperature is probably being predicted too high. I found this when I did cht analysis on turbine blades. Changing to a low Re model will reduce the metal temperature by around 10 K.

Only problem is you'll need a lot of cells 20 -25 prism layers in the boundary layer

allan

Last edited by azt; June 3, 2011 at 06:38. Reason: left someting out
azt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 3, 2011, 06:39
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Raashid Baig
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 7
cfd_newbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by azt View Post
hi

you probably need to go to a low re turbulence model with Y+ around 1, k-w-sst is a good model.

Experience would suggest that the metal temperature is probably being predicted too high. I found this when I did cht analysis on turbine blades. Changing to a low Re model will reduce the metal temperature by around 10 K.

allan
In addition to what Allan has said, if there is a significant laminar to turbulence transition than you should use LMT transition prediction turbulence prediction model.
cfd_newbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
heat transfer w/o turbulence Andrev OpenFOAM 2 May 12, 2011 13:20
CFX doesn't continue calculation... mactech001 CFX 6 November 15, 2009 22:25
how to model heat transfer for the coupled wall jing113cn FLUENT 0 June 22, 2009 03:56
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02
conjugate heat transfer in circular channel src FLUENT 1 August 6, 2004 07:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24.