CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Effect of iterations on result

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 5, 2011, 16:53
Default Effect of iterations on result
  #1
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Hi folks I was wondering what is the effect of iterations on the result.

Does increasing iteration increase accuracy of result?
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 20:59
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 10
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
generally:no! why should it?
exception: implicit code, where your matrix inversion has not converged yet....

what kind of iteration (physical / computational) did you mean?
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2011, 09:25
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 7
husker is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Could you let me ask what the physical iteration is?
husker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2011, 15:56
Default
  #4
Member
 
seyedashraf's Avatar
 
Omid Seyedashraf
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Iran
Posts: 41
Rep Power: 6
seyedashraf is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to seyedashraf Send a message via Yahoo to seyedashraf
if you know how to make the whole system and the results to converge
yes more iterations could bring better results

but you may also consider the time/cost of the accuracy
seyedashraf is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2011, 18:20
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 10
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by husker View Post
Hi,

Could you let me ask what the physical iteration is?
I was sloppy with my language there. What I meant was a physical time step in your iteration, i.e. a delta t.
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2011, 17:07
Default
  #6
Member
 
Ford Prefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 7
Ford Prefect is on a distinguished road
Do you run a transient or steady state solver?

If the convergence is well behaved then more iterations will generally lead to lower residuals. This is a good thing (to a point) in a steady state solver, but it might not be necessary within a transient solver. I would suggest that you put an iteration number so that you will reach convergence for your variables within most of the time-steps.
__________________
"Trying is the first step to failure." - Homer Simpson
Ford Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2011, 13:49
Default
  #7
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 5
sheth is on a distinguished road
Thanks for answers everyone.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 20, 2011, 19:40
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Ertan Karaismail
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 7
ertan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Prefect View Post
Do you run a transient or steady state solver?

If the convergence is well behaved then more iterations will generally lead to lower residuals. This is a good thing (to a point) in a steady state solver, but it might not be necessary within a transient solver. I would suggest that you put an iteration number so that you will reach convergence for your variables within most of the time-steps.

If I am wrong please correct me.
If you set an "iteration number" (I guess, you meant maximum iteration) and the solution does not converge to a desired value within a time step, then iteration error will start accumulating. Unless those errors are convected out with the flow, and the solution starts converging to the desired value, your simulation will have high iteration error. For an accurate simulation, generally the minimum number of (non-linear) iterations is set.
ertan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 07:20
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 06:24
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM 6 April 12, 2011 12:24
Differences between serial and parallel runs carsten OpenFOAM Bugs 11 September 12, 2008 12:16
Unknown error sivakumar OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 9 September 9, 2008 13:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49.