CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Low Mach-number Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2005, 04:43
Default Low Mach-number Problem
  #1
Guillaume Doix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I'm working on the modellisation of low-mach flows of perfect gas, and I'm facing on an airfoil Naca0012 a surprising result. My CFD Code is a compressible one and the mesh is unstructured (the finite-volume time-integration can be explicit or implicit) The publications predict that in low-mach flow (Mach from 0.1 to 0.00001) the pressure scale is proportional to Ma. As a consequence the numerical dissipation (Roe's method) has to be preconditioned (Elie Turkel) in order to obtain a scale proportional to Ma*Ma. But my results with a classic Roe's method, without any preconditioning, are giving a pressure scale proportional to Ma*Ma !! That means my compressible Code is able to deal with incompressible flows of compressible fluids without any preconditioning. That's the contrary of the works of Viozat! And I don't understand why my computation is so accurate. Besides my results without preconditioning are the same that those of Viozat (with preconditioning). Finally I have observe completly different results with the HLL method.

Has someone an idea of what can explain such a good behaviour of my Roe's method ? (I don't think it's a computational error since the results are coherents.)

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2005, 10:22
Default Re: Low Mach-number Problem
  #2
Hyun Ko
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What? That is unbelivable!!

I have been working on the CFD code development with the preconditioning method employing Roe FDS and AUSM class.

In my cases, if I don't use preconditioning, simulation results are not acceptable at low Mach flow regime, below Ma < 0.1.

If your result is true, many unresolved problems related to preconditioning method, such as numerical instability at the stagnation point, will be resolved.

  Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2005, 10:27
Default Re: Low Mach-number Problem
  #3
A.S.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try Wiess and Smith preconditioner, we have used for very low mach numbers, worked very well, only problem is at very high speed flow above mach 2-3. If I am correct the paper is in 1995 AIAA Journal for explicit method and 1997 for implicit method. or get hand of Fluent theory manual. you can get online by some google search.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 7, 2005, 12:38
Default Re: Low Mach-number Problem
  #4
Mani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's very interesting. (I wouldn't rule out a freak mistake in the code, which might give you some unintended preconditioning, but that seems very unlikely).

Do you see any convergence problems at M<0.01 ? How well does your code predict the flow in the compressible case? How does the convergence for high Mach number compare to convergence at low M?

Which integration method are you using? Are you using local time steps (which basically is a very simple form of preconditioning)?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2005, 01:35
Default Re: Low Mach-number Problem
  #5
Cfd Student
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I haven't seen any convergence problem at Mach numbers down to 10^-6. My code exploits weiss&smith preconditioner and round-off error control proposed by choi&merkle.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 12, 2005, 00:59
Default Re: Low Mach-number Problem
  #6
Mani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's cool. You should read the original post, though. This guy is claiming to have no problems without(!) any preconditioning.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces maka OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 6 August 12, 2010 09:01
Development of a Low mach PISO solver nishant_hull OpenFOAM Programming & Development 0 August 25, 2009 12:48
low velocity but high mach number? it is true! frank CFX 4 October 23, 2008 05:46
Low Mach Number Flows vatant OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 April 25, 2005 09:47
instability problem for very low reynolds number range Nuray Kayakol Main CFD Forum 1 October 22, 1999 09:03


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32.